The debate of the month is the extension of the 3% payroll tax extension. Let’s see how that will impact a taxpayer. If you were to make $40,000 per year this means about $46 per paycheck. Supposedly that will help stimulate the economy and create jobs, but don’t forget the money comes out of the Social Security Trust Fund.
But here is the problem. In just a few days you we will writing the first 2012 paychecks and we don’t know how much we are going to withhold. The IRS publications are out without the cut and I am sure that the computer programmers are going to be burning the midnight oil once Congress and the President act. There is also a chance that the extension of the law may occur early in 2012 and be retroactive to January 1, 2012. We hope that this does not happen, but recent history shows there is a good chance of it occurring.
The primary issue for our employers is whether the payroll tax software that they use is timely updated for these changes. If a new law is passed either at the end of the this month or early next month, the software may not get updated for your first payroll. This may cause it to be wrong and changes will need to be performed to get the right amount of pay to your employees and report the right taxes on your form 943 at year-end or form 941 for the first quarter.
We will keep you posted.
Friday, December 23, 2011
CLAIM IT NOW WHILE YOU CAN
Year-end tax planning: claim the non-business energy property credit while you can....
Of the many energy-saving provisions in the Code, few are more accessible to ordinary taxpayers than the $500 credit for non-business energy property. The credit can apply to relatively inexpensive, easy-to-do (perhaps even do-it-yourself) items—the installation of insulation (e.g., exterior caulking and weather-stripping), doors, and windows—as well as slightly more expensive but standard items such as central air conditioning and heat pumps. However, currently this credit only applies through 2011, and the prospects for an extension are uncertain. As a result, homeowners should consider accelerating energy-saving home improvements into this year if doing so will generate a credit.
Summary of the credit. The non-business energy property credit, as most recently extended, applies only through Dec. 31, 2011. A taxpayer can claim a credit on Form 5695 equal to 10% of the cost of: (1) qualified energy efficiency improvements, and (2) residential energy property expenditures. There is a lifetime credit limit of $500 (with no more than $200 due to windows and skylights) over the total credits allowed to the taxpayer for all earlier tax years ending after 2005. (The expenses must be for property originally placed in service by the taxpayer and made on or in connection with a dwelling unit located in the U.S., and owned and used by taxpayer as his principal residence at the time of installation.
Qualified energy efficiency improvements are energy efficient building envelope components, such as (a) insulation materials or systems specifically and primarily designed to reduce heat loss/gain that meet criteria set by the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC); or (b) exterior windows, skylights or doors, or any metal roof with pigmented coating or asphalt roof with cooling granules specifically designed to reduce heat gain, installed on a dwelling unit that meet Energy Star program requirements. The component must be expected to last for at least five years This requirement is met if the manufacturer offers a two-year warranty to repair or replace at no extra charge.
Residential energy property expenses are expenses for qualified energy property (including labor costs for onsite preparation, assembly, or original installation) that meets specific standards. The credit allowed for energy property expenditures can't exceed:
... $300 for any energy-efficient building property (electric heat pump water heater, electric heat pump; central air conditioner; natural gas, propane or oil water heater; or a stove burning biomass fuel to heat or provide hot water to a taxpayer's residence in the U.S.) that meets specific energy efficiency standards;
... $150 for a qualified natural gas, propane, or oil furnace; or qualified natural gas, propane, or oil hot water boiler; or
... $50 for an advanced main air circulating fan.
Of the many energy-saving provisions in the Code, few are more accessible to ordinary taxpayers than the $500 credit for non-business energy property. The credit can apply to relatively inexpensive, easy-to-do (perhaps even do-it-yourself) items—the installation of insulation (e.g., exterior caulking and weather-stripping), doors, and windows—as well as slightly more expensive but standard items such as central air conditioning and heat pumps. However, currently this credit only applies through 2011, and the prospects for an extension are uncertain. As a result, homeowners should consider accelerating energy-saving home improvements into this year if doing so will generate a credit.
Summary of the credit. The non-business energy property credit, as most recently extended, applies only through Dec. 31, 2011. A taxpayer can claim a credit on Form 5695 equal to 10% of the cost of: (1) qualified energy efficiency improvements, and (2) residential energy property expenditures. There is a lifetime credit limit of $500 (with no more than $200 due to windows and skylights) over the total credits allowed to the taxpayer for all earlier tax years ending after 2005. (The expenses must be for property originally placed in service by the taxpayer and made on or in connection with a dwelling unit located in the U.S., and owned and used by taxpayer as his principal residence at the time of installation.
Qualified energy efficiency improvements are energy efficient building envelope components, such as (a) insulation materials or systems specifically and primarily designed to reduce heat loss/gain that meet criteria set by the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC); or (b) exterior windows, skylights or doors, or any metal roof with pigmented coating or asphalt roof with cooling granules specifically designed to reduce heat gain, installed on a dwelling unit that meet Energy Star program requirements. The component must be expected to last for at least five years This requirement is met if the manufacturer offers a two-year warranty to repair or replace at no extra charge.
Residential energy property expenses are expenses for qualified energy property (including labor costs for onsite preparation, assembly, or original installation) that meets specific standards. The credit allowed for energy property expenditures can't exceed:
... $300 for any energy-efficient building property (electric heat pump water heater, electric heat pump; central air conditioner; natural gas, propane or oil water heater; or a stove burning biomass fuel to heat or provide hot water to a taxpayer's residence in the U.S.) that meets specific energy efficiency standards;
... $150 for a qualified natural gas, propane, or oil furnace; or qualified natural gas, propane, or oil hot water boiler; or
... $50 for an advanced main air circulating fan.
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
SIX YEAR-END TIPS TO REDUCE 2011 TAXES
The IRS wants to remind all taxpayers that with the New Year fast approaching, there is still time for you to take steps that can lower your 2011 taxes. However, you usually need to take action no later than Dec. 31 in order to claim certain tax benefits. CLICK HERE to read the 6 tips!
COMPARING THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES’ TAX PLANS
How does Mitt Romney compare to Ron Paul on taxes? Does Newt Gingrich have a savvier plan than Michele Bachmann?
The Tax Foundation just published a comparison of the presidential candidates tax plans. I always find candidates talk about taxes interesting. They proclaim that once they get into office they can flip a switch from the White House and policy will change. In actuality tax law changes start in the Ways and Means Committee of the House of Representatives. Looking at the last two major changes in the tax laws, history tells us that it takes 2 to 3 years to accomplish change. Check out their campaign promises.
With the upcoming 2012 presidential election, tax policy is on voters’ minds more than ever. Taxes are one of the central issues in any national election, and it is important for the public to understand candidates’ general views toward tax policy as well as their positions on specific issues. The online Presidential Candidate Tax Plan Comparison outlines the candidates’ positions on the most important tax questions of this election. Ten presidential candidates were evaluated on six different parameters of tax policy: individual income tax rates, the corporate income tax, the estate tax, payroll taxes, the alternative minimum tax, and taxes on capital gains and dividends.
CLICK HERE
The Tax Foundation just published a comparison of the presidential candidates tax plans. I always find candidates talk about taxes interesting. They proclaim that once they get into office they can flip a switch from the White House and policy will change. In actuality tax law changes start in the Ways and Means Committee of the House of Representatives. Looking at the last two major changes in the tax laws, history tells us that it takes 2 to 3 years to accomplish change. Check out their campaign promises.
With the upcoming 2012 presidential election, tax policy is on voters’ minds more than ever. Taxes are one of the central issues in any national election, and it is important for the public to understand candidates’ general views toward tax policy as well as their positions on specific issues. The online Presidential Candidate Tax Plan Comparison outlines the candidates’ positions on the most important tax questions of this election. Ten presidential candidates were evaluated on six different parameters of tax policy: individual income tax rates, the corporate income tax, the estate tax, payroll taxes, the alternative minimum tax, and taxes on capital gains and dividends.
CLICK HERE
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
YEAR-END TAX PLANNING
Year-end tax planning is especially challenging this year because of uncertainty over whether Congress will enact sweeping tax reform that could have a major impact in 2012 and beyond. And even if there's no major tax legislation in the immediate future, Congress next year still will have to grapple with a host of thorny issues, such as whether to once again “patch” the alternative minimum tax (e.g., to avoid a drastic drop in post-2011 exemption amounts), and what to do about the post-2012 expiration of the Bush-era income tax cuts (including the current rate schedules, and low tax rates for long-term capital gains and qualified dividends), and the expiration of favorable estate and gift rules for estates of decedents dying, gifts made, or generation-skipping transfers made after Dec. 31, 2012.
Regardless of what Congress does late this year or early the next, there are solid tax savings to be realized by taking advantage of tax breaks that are on the books for 2011 but may be gone next year unless they are extended by Congress. These include, for individuals: the option to deduct state and local sales and use taxes instead of state and local income taxes; the above-the-line deduction for qualified higher education expenses; and tax-free distributions by those age 70- 1/2 or older from IRAs for charitable purposes. For businesses, tax breaks that are available through the end of this year but won't be around next year unless Congress acts include: 100% bonus first-year depreciation for most new machinery, equipment and software; an extraordinarily high $500,000 expensing limitation (and within that dollar limit, $250,000 of expensing for qualified real property); and the research tax credit.
Regardless of what Congress does late this year or early the next, there are solid tax savings to be realized by taking advantage of tax breaks that are on the books for 2011 but may be gone next year unless they are extended by Congress. These include, for individuals: the option to deduct state and local sales and use taxes instead of state and local income taxes; the above-the-line deduction for qualified higher education expenses; and tax-free distributions by those age 70- 1/2 or older from IRAs for charitable purposes. For businesses, tax breaks that are available through the end of this year but won't be around next year unless Congress acts include: 100% bonus first-year depreciation for most new machinery, equipment and software; an extraordinarily high $500,000 expensing limitation (and within that dollar limit, $250,000 of expensing for qualified real property); and the research tax credit.
Friday, December 16, 2011
1099 FORM LETTER TO YOUR VENDORS
We thought it might be helpful if you had a ‘form’ letter in which you could send to your vendors. Please feel free to copy and paste this into a word doc and send it out. Click on the link below the letter to obtain the W-9.
Dear Vendor,
IRS regulation requires that we issue 1099 forms to certain companies and individuals. In order to accurately prepare these forms, IRS requires that we obtain and maintain form W-9 for all of our vendors.
Therefore, in order to ensure our reporting accuracy, please complete the enclosed form W-9 and return to us by mail or fax.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
W-9 LINK
Dear Vendor,
IRS regulation requires that we issue 1099 forms to certain companies and individuals. In order to accurately prepare these forms, IRS requires that we obtain and maintain form W-9 for all of our vendors.
Therefore, in order to ensure our reporting accuracy, please complete the enclosed form W-9 and return to us by mail or fax.
Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
W-9 LINK
Thursday, December 15, 2011
W-9 WHAT ABOUT SENDING TO….
Q. I read your business blog and saw the topic on ‘Issuing 1099-MISC’s’: I own an Electrical company and wondered if I need to send a w-9 to our vendors for the Electrical Co. & the Construction Co.? And then send 1099’s to them if required. ~ Thanks for your help.
A. I would advise getting W-9’s from them. This will assure that you were not required to do backup withholding. The IRS has not been penalizing companies that do not have W-9’s but it technically is required. My guess is that someday this will be an issue. You just as well get ahead of the curve.
If they are not a corporation and they are providing services then a 1099 is in order. If they are just your supplier and you buy inventory, hard goods etc. then you do not need to do a 1099. Some taxpayers are unsure of the form of business of the companies that they are dealing with. The W-9 will solve that problem. At the same time if you are not sure there form of business it is okay to send a 1099. There is no penalty for sending to a corp.
A. I would advise getting W-9’s from them. This will assure that you were not required to do backup withholding. The IRS has not been penalizing companies that do not have W-9’s but it technically is required. My guess is that someday this will be an issue. You just as well get ahead of the curve.
If they are not a corporation and they are providing services then a 1099 is in order. If they are just your supplier and you buy inventory, hard goods etc. then you do not need to do a 1099. Some taxpayers are unsure of the form of business of the companies that they are dealing with. The W-9 will solve that problem. At the same time if you are not sure there form of business it is okay to send a 1099. There is no penalty for sending to a corp.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
IRS OFFERS TIPS FOR YEAR-END GIVING
If you itemize your deductions (long form), you can deduct charitable contributions. The IRS just published Tips for Year-End Giving that you might want to review.CLICK HERE
Monday, December 12, 2011
DON’T FORGET YOUR FLEXIBLE SPENDING MONEY
Check your flexible spending account balance. You must clean it out by Dec. 31 if your employer still has not adopted the 2½-month grace period that IRS now permits. Otherwise, any money remaining in your account is forfeited. When you are deciding how much you should put into your flex plan for 2012, remember that a $2,500 annual cap on FSA payins is set to go into effect in 2013.
Friday, December 9, 2011
CLEAN OUT THE CLOSETS
AND GET A TAX DEDUCTIONIf you itemize deductions (the long form) you not only can deduct your cash contributions but you can also deduct your non cash contributions. What we are talking about here is items given to the Salvation Army and the like. Remember the key is Documentation, Documentation, Documentation!
Here are the rules for non cash contributions:
First, make sure that this is a qualified charity. If in doubt ask to see their 501(c) approval.
Remember, no matter how charitable a contribution to an individual may be, contributions to individuals are not deductible.
If the contribution of goods is less than $250 you should have either a written acknowledgment from the charity of some other reliable list.
If the goods have a value between $250 and $500 then you need a written acknowledgement and, of course a list.
If between $500 and $5,000 then written acknowledgement; your list and a file a Form 8283 with the return.
If over $5,000 all of the above and you must file an appraisal with the return.
Thursday, December 8, 2011
ONLY IN AMERICA
A fugitive who took a Kansas couple hostage in their home is suing them for $235,000. Accused murderer Jesse Dimmick claims Jared and Lindsay Rowley accepted his knifepoint offer of money to hide in their house. But the Rowleys later breached their "oral contract" by escaping as he slept, Dimmick says, "resulting in my being shot in the back by authorities."Wow only in America!
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
PLANNING IDEAS FOR THE CURRENT LOWER CAPITAL GAINS & DIVIDEND RATES
1. Don't forget that there is a 0% qualified dividend and long term capital gain rate if you have AGI below $69,000 ($34,500 for singles). This is also the case for 2012. It is possible to generate "free" capital gain and dividend income.
2. Gifting appreciated stock to adult children or parents in a low bracket can be a good plan for utilizing the 0% rate.
3. Watch installment sales. Installment sale proceeds are taxed at the rate in effect in the year the principal is collected. Collections in 2011 and 2012 will be at the 0% or 15% rates. Collections in later years maybe subject to higher capital gains rates and, for some upper income taxpayers, the new 3.8% Medicare tax may apply in 2013.
4. Watch out for AMT. The AMT and state taxes often makes effective LTCG higher than the 15% that is advertised.
5. If you have a corporation you have two or years to pay out dividends at the 15% rate. This may be a good time to clear out shareholder loans
2. Gifting appreciated stock to adult children or parents in a low bracket can be a good plan for utilizing the 0% rate.
3. Watch installment sales. Installment sale proceeds are taxed at the rate in effect in the year the principal is collected. Collections in 2011 and 2012 will be at the 0% or 15% rates. Collections in later years maybe subject to higher capital gains rates and, for some upper income taxpayers, the new 3.8% Medicare tax may apply in 2013.
4. Watch out for AMT. The AMT and state taxes often makes effective LTCG higher than the 15% that is advertised.
5. If you have a corporation you have two or years to pay out dividends at the 15% rate. This may be a good time to clear out shareholder loans
Monday, December 5, 2011
2012 STANDARD MILEAGE RATES
The Internal Revenue Service today issued the 2012 optional standard mileage rates used to calculate the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving purposes.
Beginning on Jan. 1, 2012, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) will be:
~55.5 cents per mile for business miles driven
~23 cents per mile driven for medical or moving purposes
~14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations
The rate for business miles driven is unchanged from the mid-year adjustment that became effective on July 1, 2011. The medical and moving rate has been reduced by 0.5 cents per mile.
The standard mileage rate for business is based on an annual study of the fixed and variable costs of operating an automobile. The rate for medical and moving purposes is based on the variable costs as determined by the same study.
Independent contractor Runzheimer International conducted the study. You do have the option of calculating the actual costs of using your vehicle rather than using the standard mileage rates.
Beginning on Jan. 1, 2012, the standard mileage rates for the use of a car (also vans, pickups or panel trucks) will be:
~55.5 cents per mile for business miles driven
~23 cents per mile driven for medical or moving purposes
~14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations
The rate for business miles driven is unchanged from the mid-year adjustment that became effective on July 1, 2011. The medical and moving rate has been reduced by 0.5 cents per mile.
The standard mileage rate for business is based on an annual study of the fixed and variable costs of operating an automobile. The rate for medical and moving purposes is based on the variable costs as determined by the same study.
Independent contractor Runzheimer International conducted the study. You do have the option of calculating the actual costs of using your vehicle rather than using the standard mileage rates.
Saturday, December 3, 2011
HARSH 1099 PENALTIES
The IRS wants everyone to issue 1099's so that they can spot unreported income. This year the penalty for failure to file a 1099 is $250 per form with an addition $250 per form if you did not act in good faith.I can guarantee you that one of the first things that the IRS looks at during the audit is 1099's. It is easy money for them if you did not file.
Think about it. If you missed 10 forms for three years the penalty would be $7,500 minimum with it possibly going to $15,000. That is on just 10 missed forms. Do the math. Make sure you issue 1099's.
Friday, December 2, 2011
CHINA BUYING LAND IN SOUTH AMERICA
I was going through some clippings I saved from this summer and ran across an article in the Wall Street Journal that reported that Chinese companies are continuing to invest in South America especially in buying up farm land to feed their people. Through the twelve month period ended May 31, 2011, the China’s investment in Latin America had hit $15.6 billion.During the last three years, more than 70% of their investments had been in energy and minerals, but farming is attracting more attention.
This summer, China’s largest farming company, Heilongjian Beidahuan Nongken Group signed a joint venture with Argentina’s Creud SA to buy land and farm soybeans. Creud SA already controls more than 2.5 million acres of land in Argentina. Heilongjian had already indicated back in March their intentions to purchase 500 thousand acres of land overseas during this year and Latin America is their primary target area.
They are also spending $1.5 billion to develop about 750 thousand acres of land in Rio Negro Province over a ten year period. These developments will not be a direct purchase of land, but they will be in control of the production.
With the backing of the Chinese government, it looks like this type of investment is going forward.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
QUESTION FROM A MISCLASSIFIED WORKER
Q. I am definitely an employee at my job but, my employer did not withhold anything and instead of giving me a W-2 like he should have he gave me a 1099. Last year he gave me a W-2. Now not only do I owe a bunch of tax I also have to pay both halves of the Social Security and Medicare tax. This is not fair. Is there anything I can do?
A. Yes there is something you can do to cut your Social Security and Medicare in half. Since 2007, you are allowed to file a Form 8919M Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on wages instead of filing Schedule SE. The form SE charges you tax at 15.3% versus the 7.65%.
There are some codes on the form that you will need to review and if you meet one of the criteria, walla you qualify.
By the way, this IRS may be visiting your employer. He will at least be getting a bill from the IRS for his 1/2.
A. Yes there is something you can do to cut your Social Security and Medicare in half. Since 2007, you are allowed to file a Form 8919M Uncollected Social Security and Medicare Tax on wages instead of filing Schedule SE. The form SE charges you tax at 15.3% versus the 7.65%.
There are some codes on the form that you will need to review and if you meet one of the criteria, walla you qualify.
By the way, this IRS may be visiting your employer. He will at least be getting a bill from the IRS for his 1/2.
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
A NEW CHRISTMAS TRADITION
I received this from someone and thought maybe you might be interested.
Christmas 2011 -- Birth of a New Tradition
As the holidays approach, the giant Asian factories are kicking into high gear to provide Americans with monstrous piles of cheaply produced goods -- merchandise that has been produced at the expense of American labor.
This year will be different. This year Americans will give the gift of genuine concern for other Americans. There is no longer an excuse that, at gift giving time, nothing can be found that is produced by American hands. Oh.... Yes there is! It is time to think outside the box, people. Who says a gift needs to fit in a shirt box, wrapped in Chinese produced wrapping paper?
Everyone -- yes EVERYONE gets their hair cut. How about gift certificates from your local American hair salon or barber?
Gym membership? It's appropriate for all ages who are thinking about some health improvement.
Who wouldn't appreciate getting their car detailed? Small, American owned detail shops and car washes would love to sell you a gift certificate or a book of gift certificates.
Are you one of those extravagant givers who think nothing of plunking down the Benjamins on a Chinese-made flat-screen TV? Perhaps that grateful gift receiver would like his driveway sealed, or lawn mowed for the summer, or driveway plowed all winter, or games at the local golf course.
There are a gazillion owner-run restaurants—all offering gift certificates. And, if your intended isn't the fancy eatery sort, what about a half dozen breakfasts at the local breakfast joint.
Remember, folks this isn't about big National chains—this is about supporting your home town Americans with their financial lives on the line to keep their doors open.
How many people couldn't use an oil change for their car, truck or motorcycle, done at a shop run by the American working guy?
Thinking about a heartfelt gift for mom? Mom would LOVE the services of a local cleaning lady for a day.
My computer could use a tune-up, and I KNOW I can find some young guy who is struggling to get his repair business up and running.
OK, you were looking for something more personal. Local crafts people spin their own wool and knit them into scarves. They make jewelry, and pottery and beautiful wooden boxes.
Plan your holiday outings at local, owner operated restaurants and leave your server a nice tip.
And, how about going out to see a play or ballet at your hometown theatre. Musicians need love too, so find a venue showcasing local bands.
Honestly, do you REALLY need to buy another ten thousand Chinese lights for the house? When you buy a five dollar string of lights, about fifty cents stays in the community.
If you have those kinds of bucks to burn, leave the mailman, trash guy or babysitter a nice BIG tip.
You see, Christmas is no longer about draining American pockets so that China can build another glittering city. Christmas is now about caring about US (We the People), encouraging American small businesses to keep plugging away to follow their dreams. And, when we care about other Americans, we care about our communities, and the benefits come back to us in ways we could not imagine.
THIS could become the new American Christmas tradition!!
Christmas 2011 -- Birth of a New Tradition
As the holidays approach, the giant Asian factories are kicking into high gear to provide Americans with monstrous piles of cheaply produced goods -- merchandise that has been produced at the expense of American labor.
This year will be different. This year Americans will give the gift of genuine concern for other Americans. There is no longer an excuse that, at gift giving time, nothing can be found that is produced by American hands. Oh.... Yes there is! It is time to think outside the box, people. Who says a gift needs to fit in a shirt box, wrapped in Chinese produced wrapping paper?
Everyone -- yes EVERYONE gets their hair cut. How about gift certificates from your local American hair salon or barber?
Gym membership? It's appropriate for all ages who are thinking about some health improvement.
Who wouldn't appreciate getting their car detailed? Small, American owned detail shops and car washes would love to sell you a gift certificate or a book of gift certificates.
Are you one of those extravagant givers who think nothing of plunking down the Benjamins on a Chinese-made flat-screen TV? Perhaps that grateful gift receiver would like his driveway sealed, or lawn mowed for the summer, or driveway plowed all winter, or games at the local golf course.
There are a gazillion owner-run restaurants—all offering gift certificates. And, if your intended isn't the fancy eatery sort, what about a half dozen breakfasts at the local breakfast joint.
Remember, folks this isn't about big National chains—this is about supporting your home town Americans with their financial lives on the line to keep their doors open.
How many people couldn't use an oil change for their car, truck or motorcycle, done at a shop run by the American working guy?
Thinking about a heartfelt gift for mom? Mom would LOVE the services of a local cleaning lady for a day.
My computer could use a tune-up, and I KNOW I can find some young guy who is struggling to get his repair business up and running.
OK, you were looking for something more personal. Local crafts people spin their own wool and knit them into scarves. They make jewelry, and pottery and beautiful wooden boxes.
Plan your holiday outings at local, owner operated restaurants and leave your server a nice tip.
And, how about going out to see a play or ballet at your hometown theatre. Musicians need love too, so find a venue showcasing local bands.
Honestly, do you REALLY need to buy another ten thousand Chinese lights for the house? When you buy a five dollar string of lights, about fifty cents stays in the community.
If you have those kinds of bucks to burn, leave the mailman, trash guy or babysitter a nice BIG tip.
You see, Christmas is no longer about draining American pockets so that China can build another glittering city. Christmas is now about caring about US (We the People), encouraging American small businesses to keep plugging away to follow their dreams. And, when we care about other Americans, we care about our communities, and the benefits come back to us in ways we could not imagine.
THIS could become the new American Christmas tradition!!
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
HOBBY WINNINGS
Q. Last year I was pretty lucky at golf. I actually won $2,800 in cash and about $4,000 in clubs, shoes, and golf clothes. Someone told me that this was taxable. Tell me it is not so.A. Sorry, bad news. You must report your winnings on your income tax return.
Since this is most likely considered a hobby rather than a business, you would report winnings as “other income” on line 21 on your federal form 1040. If that’s the case, you can claim deductions – like entry fees, equipment, lessons, and other related expenses against your winnings but only if you itemize. This would be under the classification of “miscellaneous itemized deductions” on your Schedule A. Those miscellaneous itemized deductions are limited to those in excess of 2% of your AGI (adjusted gross income).
Additionally, if you treat golf as a hobby, your deductions are limited to the amount of your winnings. You also can’t carry excess deductions forwards or backwards.
In summary, the income is taxable and any deductions you have are only good if you itemize and if your miscellaneous deductions are greater than 2% of your adjusted gross income (found on the bottom of page one of your 1040).
ACCOUNTANTS IN THE MOVIES
In Hollywood, accounting can seem like a pretty glamorous profession, or not.Ben Kingsley played compassionate accountant Itzhak Stern in the Oscar-winning 1993 Steven Spielberg movie, "Schindler's List." Stern was a real-life accountant who worked for German industrialist Oskar Schindler, played by Liam Neeson. The accountant typed and maintained the list of names of his fellow Jews who were hired to work in Schindler's factories, preventing them from being sent to the Nazi death camps. The real Itzhak Stern appeared in the movie, along with the surviving people on Oskar Schindler's real-life list.
Thursday, November 24, 2011
HAPPY THANKSGIVING
Most of All
Thanksgiving Day brings to mind
the blessings in our lives
that usually go unnoticed:
a home that surrounds us
with comfort and protection;
delicious food, for pleasure
in both eating and sharing;
clothes to snuggle up in,
books and good entertainment
to expand our minds;
and freedom to worship our God.
Most of all we are thankful
for our family and friends,
those treasured people
who make our lives extra special.
You are part of that cherished group.
On Thanksgiving, (and every day)
we appreciate you.
Happy Thanksgiving
From Kopsa Otte
Thanksgiving Day brings to mind
the blessings in our lives
that usually go unnoticed:
a home that surrounds us
with comfort and protection;
delicious food, for pleasure
in both eating and sharing;
clothes to snuggle up in,
books and good entertainment
to expand our minds;
and freedom to worship our God.
Most of all we are thankful
for our family and friends,
those treasured people
who make our lives extra special.
You are part of that cherished group.
On Thanksgiving, (and every day)
we appreciate you.
Happy Thanksgiving
From Kopsa Otte
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
NEW ADDITION!
We are excited to announce that
Megan had a beautiful little girl yesterday.
Adelynn Lauren
7lbs 8oz. and 20 inches longAdelynn Lauren
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
ACCOUNTANTS IN THE MOVIES
In Hollywood, accounting can seem like a pretty glamorous profession, or not.Jack Lemmon plays an accountant in the 1954 comedy "Phffft!" who decides to split with wife Judy Holliday after eight years of marriage. He met her while doing her taxes, and even after they break up and start seeing other partners, he continues to keep her as a client. The unusual title is supposed to be the sound of a marriage losing steam. Lemmon also played an accountant in Billy Wilder's 1960 comedy, "The Apartment," in which he lends his apartment to boss Fred MacMurray for assignations with girlfriend Shirley Maclaine. The movie was later the basis of the musical "Promises, Promises."
Monday, November 21, 2011
529 PLAN FOR COLLEGE
Q. When I was in for my pretax appointment, I mentioned the 529 Plan for college funding. You mentioned that you were not excited about the 529 Plan because of the fees charged and because the only real tax advantage is that the interest is not taxable. Do you have any more information on the plans? Thank you.
A. It was great to visit with you at your pretax appointment. Here is some more information about 529 Plans.
· As I mentioned you don't get a federal income tax deduction for the contribution, but the earnings on the account aren't taxed while the funds are in the program. You can change the beneficiary or roll over the funds in the program to another plan for the same or a different beneficiary without income tax consequences.
· Distributions from the program are tax-free if they don't exceed the student's qualified higher education expenses. These include tuition, fees, books, supplies, and required equipment. Reasonable room and board is also a qualified expense if the student is enrolled at least half-time.
· There is some confusion about computer technology. For 2010 computer technology or equipment, or Internet access or related services, was a qualified expense. They changed that and those costs are not longer eligible.
· Distributions in excess of qualified expenses are taxed to the beneficiary to the extent that they represent earnings on the account. A 10% penalty tax will also be imposed.
· Eligible schools include colleges, universities, vocational schools, or other postsecondary schools eligible to participate in a student aid program of the Department of Education. This includes nearly all accredited public, nonprofit, and proprietary (for-profit) postsecondary institutions. A school should be able to tell you whether it qualifies.
· The contributions you make to the qualified tuition program are treated as gifts to the student, but the contributions qualify for the annual gift tax exclusion, which is $13,000. If your contributions in a year exceed the exclusion amount, you can elect to take the contributions into account ratably over a five-year period starting with the year of the contributions. Thus, assuming you make no other gifts to that beneficiary, you could contribute up to $65,000 per beneficiary in 2011 without gift tax.
· Depending on the plan, there may be some state benefits.
· Check out the website which provides more information: 529 Plans
Let me know if you have any questions.
A. It was great to visit with you at your pretax appointment. Here is some more information about 529 Plans.
· As I mentioned you don't get a federal income tax deduction for the contribution, but the earnings on the account aren't taxed while the funds are in the program. You can change the beneficiary or roll over the funds in the program to another plan for the same or a different beneficiary without income tax consequences.
· Distributions from the program are tax-free if they don't exceed the student's qualified higher education expenses. These include tuition, fees, books, supplies, and required equipment. Reasonable room and board is also a qualified expense if the student is enrolled at least half-time.
· There is some confusion about computer technology. For 2010 computer technology or equipment, or Internet access or related services, was a qualified expense. They changed that and those costs are not longer eligible.
· Distributions in excess of qualified expenses are taxed to the beneficiary to the extent that they represent earnings on the account. A 10% penalty tax will also be imposed.
· Eligible schools include colleges, universities, vocational schools, or other postsecondary schools eligible to participate in a student aid program of the Department of Education. This includes nearly all accredited public, nonprofit, and proprietary (for-profit) postsecondary institutions. A school should be able to tell you whether it qualifies.
· The contributions you make to the qualified tuition program are treated as gifts to the student, but the contributions qualify for the annual gift tax exclusion, which is $13,000. If your contributions in a year exceed the exclusion amount, you can elect to take the contributions into account ratably over a five-year period starting with the year of the contributions. Thus, assuming you make no other gifts to that beneficiary, you could contribute up to $65,000 per beneficiary in 2011 without gift tax.
· Depending on the plan, there may be some state benefits.
· Check out the website which provides more information: 529 Plans
Let me know if you have any questions.
Saturday, November 19, 2011
OTHER TIMES THE ECONOMY CRASHED
It seems that everybody is talking about the economy. When we think of economic crises in America, two periods come to mind—the Great Depression and whatever it is we’re in the middle of right now. But the U.S. stock market has crashed more times than we’d like to admit. Historically, our economy has been brought to its knees by everything from greedy bankers to horse illnesses. So let’s take a deep breath and remember that ‘panics’ are just part of the American way of life.
1. The Panic of 1873: America Stops Horsing Around
During the late 19th century, the American economy relied on horses the way it depends on gas today. Horse’s unloaded cargo from ports, transported goods from city to city, worked the farms, supported the army, and served as the emergency vehicles of choice. Without them, the American workforce would have ground to a halt.
And that’s exactly what happened in 1872, when an estimated 99% of all horses in America contracted equine influenza. The highly contagious strain started in Canada and spread through New England to the South in a matter of months, leaving horses across the country too weak to stand and coughing uncontrollably. Street buggies stopped running, paralyzing commerce in the cities. Railroads were stymied because trains run on coal —coal that was hauled out of mines by horses. And as the horse flu spread, U.S. military troops had to go into battle on foot (they were fighting Apache Indians at the time). More tragically, a fire in Boston raged for three days because there were no horses to carry water. The flames destroyed more than 700 buildings, causing an estimated $73.5 million in damages and killing at least 20 people.
The “Great Epizootic,” as it was called, spiraled out of control in less than a year. At the height of the panic, as many as 20,000 businesses failed, a third of all railroads went bankrupt, and unemployment spiked to almost 15 percent. The economy took nearly a decade to recover. Ironically, nearly all of the horses recuperated by the following spring.
2. The Winter of 1886: When the Cows Don’t Come Home
During the second half of the 19th century, cattle ranches in the American West were thriving. From the Montana grasslands to the Texas prairie, ranches were attracting investors back East and across the pond in Europe. But by 1886, things were getting dicey. Overgrazing, coupled with a hot and dry summer had left the plains almost bare.
Then came the snow. Known as the “Winter of Death”, the following season saw one of the worst cold spells in recorded history. More than half the cattle in the West froze to death, unable to move in the thick snow. Ghoulish firsthand accounts describe the bodies of dead cows stretching for miles across the horizon. When the spring thaw and floods came, thousands of bloated corpses floated into the streams and rivers. Some ranchers quit the business entirely and didn’t even bother to round up their surviving cattle.
By the end of 1887, the disaster had wiped out more than half of the United States’ western cattle and debilitated the national economy. Most cattle investors went bankrupt, and thousands of cowboys were left unemployed. But more than anything, the winter of 1886 put an end to all those turn-of-the-century idyllic fantasies of open-range ranching in the Wild West.
3. The Panic of 1907: Captains of Industry to the Rescue!
The Panic of 1907 started the way many panics do, with a greedy capitalist. Multimillionaire Augustus Heinze, who had made his fortune mining in Montana, believed he had enough control over the copper industry to corner the market. With the help of several major banks, he concocted a scheme to buy up all the shares of United Copper. But Heinze had overestimated his prowess, and the scheme failed, bringing down Heinze, United Copper, the banks, and many, many stockholders. The debacle sent ripples of anxiety throughout the market, and investors started pulling their money out of banks altogether. After one of New York City’s biggest trusts went under, panic ensued, and the stock market collapsed.
At the time, there were no central banks in place, so the federal government had no means of bailing out businesses or injecting cash into the economy. It just stood by, idly waiting for a hero to save the day. Amazingly, one did.
James Pierpont Morgan, banker extraordinaire, rescued the American economy. He propped up many of the failing banks in New York by twisting the arms of other financiers, and he assuaged investors’ fears by backing up the market with his own vast cash reserves. Before long, Wall Street was on the mend.
The government also learned its lesson. With the panic resolved, it created the Federal Reserve, ensuring that it could buttress the economy during hard times. Since then, the government has taken a more active role in financial matters and relied less on the kindness of robber barons.
4. Whale of a Crisis: The Collapse of America’s First Oil Industry
During the early 19th century, America was one of the top oil-producing countries in the world. But it wasn’t petroleum the nation was exporting; it was whale oil. By the mid-1800s, the high-risk, high-profit business was the fifth-largest industry in the United States. At its height, the American whaling industry produced more than 10 million gallons of oil a year and sold it for $1.77 a gallon (about $35 per gallon today). Better still; an American fleet of 1,000 ships had exclusive access to the North Atlantic territories, which ensured profits.
What could have stopped such a juggernaut of an industry? For one thing, other sources of oil. In 1846, Canadian geologist Abraham Gesner developed a technique for distilling kerosene from petroleum, and within a few decades, kerosene had replaced whale oil as the most popular fuel for lamps. Another reason for the decline was that the whales were dying off. The enthusiastic slaughter throughout the 1800s drove some whale species to extinction and put others on the brink. With so few left to hunt, the cost of whaling became prohibitively expensive. The final blow to whalers came during the harsh winter of 1871, when the North Atlantic ice trapped and crushed the bulk of the American fleet.
Although American consumers didn’t suffer as the country switched from whale oil to petroleum, coastal towns in New England and the Mid-Atlantic languished, and shipbuilders and fishermen found themselves out of work. By the time of the Civil War, whaling ships had become so worthless that Union soldiers loaded a fleet of them with stones and sank them into Charleston harbor. The hope was to blockade the South from the port, but when the plan didn’t work, the ships were no great loss. America’s first oil industry had been tapped out.
So just hang on. We have been here before and I imagine that we will see problems again.
1. The Panic of 1873: America Stops Horsing Around
During the late 19th century, the American economy relied on horses the way it depends on gas today. Horse’s unloaded cargo from ports, transported goods from city to city, worked the farms, supported the army, and served as the emergency vehicles of choice. Without them, the American workforce would have ground to a halt.
And that’s exactly what happened in 1872, when an estimated 99% of all horses in America contracted equine influenza. The highly contagious strain started in Canada and spread through New England to the South in a matter of months, leaving horses across the country too weak to stand and coughing uncontrollably. Street buggies stopped running, paralyzing commerce in the cities. Railroads were stymied because trains run on coal —coal that was hauled out of mines by horses. And as the horse flu spread, U.S. military troops had to go into battle on foot (they were fighting Apache Indians at the time). More tragically, a fire in Boston raged for three days because there were no horses to carry water. The flames destroyed more than 700 buildings, causing an estimated $73.5 million in damages and killing at least 20 people.
The “Great Epizootic,” as it was called, spiraled out of control in less than a year. At the height of the panic, as many as 20,000 businesses failed, a third of all railroads went bankrupt, and unemployment spiked to almost 15 percent. The economy took nearly a decade to recover. Ironically, nearly all of the horses recuperated by the following spring.
2. The Winter of 1886: When the Cows Don’t Come Home
During the second half of the 19th century, cattle ranches in the American West were thriving. From the Montana grasslands to the Texas prairie, ranches were attracting investors back East and across the pond in Europe. But by 1886, things were getting dicey. Overgrazing, coupled with a hot and dry summer had left the plains almost bare.
Then came the snow. Known as the “Winter of Death”, the following season saw one of the worst cold spells in recorded history. More than half the cattle in the West froze to death, unable to move in the thick snow. Ghoulish firsthand accounts describe the bodies of dead cows stretching for miles across the horizon. When the spring thaw and floods came, thousands of bloated corpses floated into the streams and rivers. Some ranchers quit the business entirely and didn’t even bother to round up their surviving cattle.
By the end of 1887, the disaster had wiped out more than half of the United States’ western cattle and debilitated the national economy. Most cattle investors went bankrupt, and thousands of cowboys were left unemployed. But more than anything, the winter of 1886 put an end to all those turn-of-the-century idyllic fantasies of open-range ranching in the Wild West.
3. The Panic of 1907: Captains of Industry to the Rescue!
The Panic of 1907 started the way many panics do, with a greedy capitalist. Multimillionaire Augustus Heinze, who had made his fortune mining in Montana, believed he had enough control over the copper industry to corner the market. With the help of several major banks, he concocted a scheme to buy up all the shares of United Copper. But Heinze had overestimated his prowess, and the scheme failed, bringing down Heinze, United Copper, the banks, and many, many stockholders. The debacle sent ripples of anxiety throughout the market, and investors started pulling their money out of banks altogether. After one of New York City’s biggest trusts went under, panic ensued, and the stock market collapsed.
At the time, there were no central banks in place, so the federal government had no means of bailing out businesses or injecting cash into the economy. It just stood by, idly waiting for a hero to save the day. Amazingly, one did.
James Pierpont Morgan, banker extraordinaire, rescued the American economy. He propped up many of the failing banks in New York by twisting the arms of other financiers, and he assuaged investors’ fears by backing up the market with his own vast cash reserves. Before long, Wall Street was on the mend.
The government also learned its lesson. With the panic resolved, it created the Federal Reserve, ensuring that it could buttress the economy during hard times. Since then, the government has taken a more active role in financial matters and relied less on the kindness of robber barons.
4. Whale of a Crisis: The Collapse of America’s First Oil Industry
During the early 19th century, America was one of the top oil-producing countries in the world. But it wasn’t petroleum the nation was exporting; it was whale oil. By the mid-1800s, the high-risk, high-profit business was the fifth-largest industry in the United States. At its height, the American whaling industry produced more than 10 million gallons of oil a year and sold it for $1.77 a gallon (about $35 per gallon today). Better still; an American fleet of 1,000 ships had exclusive access to the North Atlantic territories, which ensured profits.
What could have stopped such a juggernaut of an industry? For one thing, other sources of oil. In 1846, Canadian geologist Abraham Gesner developed a technique for distilling kerosene from petroleum, and within a few decades, kerosene had replaced whale oil as the most popular fuel for lamps. Another reason for the decline was that the whales were dying off. The enthusiastic slaughter throughout the 1800s drove some whale species to extinction and put others on the brink. With so few left to hunt, the cost of whaling became prohibitively expensive. The final blow to whalers came during the harsh winter of 1871, when the North Atlantic ice trapped and crushed the bulk of the American fleet.
Although American consumers didn’t suffer as the country switched from whale oil to petroleum, coastal towns in New England and the Mid-Atlantic languished, and shipbuilders and fishermen found themselves out of work. By the time of the Civil War, whaling ships had become so worthless that Union soldiers loaded a fleet of them with stones and sank them into Charleston harbor. The hope was to blockade the South from the port, but when the plan didn’t work, the ships were no great loss. America’s first oil industry had been tapped out.
So just hang on. We have been here before and I imagine that we will see problems again.
I FORGOT TO FILE MY 2010 RETURN. WHAT DO I DO?
Q. I’m an independent contractor using 1099s. I have one w-2 for a small amount from 2010. I missed the tax deadline and did not file an extension. What kind of advice can you give me? I live in CA but need some general direction.
A. File. That’s my advice in a nutshell.
One of the biggest mistakes that I see in my practice is giving up early. After a mistake or a missed deadline, many taxpayers get a bit overwhelmed and put their head in the sand – or they figure that since they’ve already messed up, they’ll wait and fix it later. Don’t fall into that trap.
Keep in mind that penalties are based on the passage of time. If you fail to file on time, you can be subject to a penalty of 5% of the amount of unpaid taxes for each month (or part of a month) that your tax return is late, not to exceed 25% of your unpaid taxes. If you also fail to pay, you can be subject to a penalty of ½ of 1% (or .005%) of the amount of your taxes due for each month or part of a month after April 15 that the taxes are not paid, also not to exceed 25% of your taxes. So the longer you wait to fix the problem, the more that it’s going to cost you. And don’t forget about interest, which will be charged on top of penalties.
Also keep in mind that the IRS is much happier when you come to them, as opposed to the IRS coming to you. If forms 1099 (or other forms) have been filed on your behalf by the issuer, the IRS knows that you exist. They’re going to be waiting to hear from you.
Filing your taxes late isn’t the end of the world. It’s fixable. But the faster you fix it, the better.
A. File. That’s my advice in a nutshell.
One of the biggest mistakes that I see in my practice is giving up early. After a mistake or a missed deadline, many taxpayers get a bit overwhelmed and put their head in the sand – or they figure that since they’ve already messed up, they’ll wait and fix it later. Don’t fall into that trap.
Keep in mind that penalties are based on the passage of time. If you fail to file on time, you can be subject to a penalty of 5% of the amount of unpaid taxes for each month (or part of a month) that your tax return is late, not to exceed 25% of your unpaid taxes. If you also fail to pay, you can be subject to a penalty of ½ of 1% (or .005%) of the amount of your taxes due for each month or part of a month after April 15 that the taxes are not paid, also not to exceed 25% of your taxes. So the longer you wait to fix the problem, the more that it’s going to cost you. And don’t forget about interest, which will be charged on top of penalties.
Also keep in mind that the IRS is much happier when you come to them, as opposed to the IRS coming to you. If forms 1099 (or other forms) have been filed on your behalf by the issuer, the IRS knows that you exist. They’re going to be waiting to hear from you.
Filing your taxes late isn’t the end of the world. It’s fixable. But the faster you fix it, the better.
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
WASHINGTON D.C. UPDATE PART #4
Here are some Social Security facts that you might be interested in:
- If you are under 55 and they made no changes to the law so you can expect to receive 77% of the benefits that you normally would be eligible for; if you are over 55 you should receive 100% of the benefits.
- To fix the program Congress needs to do one of two things, or some combination: Increase income from payroll taxes by 17% AND Reduce current benefits by 14%
- Social Security was never meant to provide 100% of the living expenses for retired individuals.
- 80 million baby boomers will be eligible for Social Security in the next 10 years.
- As a cost cutting measure, the Social Security Administration has quit sending out the annual Social Security Statements that you normally received around you birthday. They are going to be providing the information on line, but they can't figure out how they are going to do that. Make sure you keep your last statement.
- Right now if you retire at age 62 versus age 65 you will get 75% of full benefits. The decision depends on your individual circumstances.
- The Social Security system is not a "the more you pay in the more you get." The lower 30% get much more than they pay in and more than the higher 70%.
- If you are under 55 and they made no changes to the law so you can expect to receive 77% of the benefits that you normally would be eligible for; if you are over 55 you should receive 100% of the benefits.
- To fix the program Congress needs to do one of two things, or some combination: Increase income from payroll taxes by 17% AND Reduce current benefits by 14%
- Social Security was never meant to provide 100% of the living expenses for retired individuals.
- 80 million baby boomers will be eligible for Social Security in the next 10 years.
- As a cost cutting measure, the Social Security Administration has quit sending out the annual Social Security Statements that you normally received around you birthday. They are going to be providing the information on line, but they can't figure out how they are going to do that. Make sure you keep your last statement.
- Right now if you retire at age 62 versus age 65 you will get 75% of full benefits. The decision depends on your individual circumstances.
- The Social Security system is not a "the more you pay in the more you get." The lower 30% get much more than they pay in and more than the higher 70%.
WASHINGTON D.C. UPDATE PART #3
The Commissioner of the Small Business and Self Employed division spoke on initiatives that the IRS is taking especially the new requirement to turn over your software files if you are audited.
The IRS now can request backup copies of your software.
This is going to give them access to entries not only to your books but also it will allow the auditor to look at adjustments and changes that were made to your books by looking at the audit trail.
This is concerning. Think about yearend adjustments that are made when cleaning up the books and then when doing tax planning. The auditor is going to see those changes and will be asking questions.
Here is an example: Assume the owner of the business takes money from the business during the year. The bookkeeper classifies this as a loan. After the yearend we are looking at the transactions and determine that this actually should have been a dividend. On March 1st of the subsequent year we either make an entry or reclassify the check. The auditor is going to know about the entry through the audit function and think that we are doing some "hankie pankie" post yearend planning.
Here are some of the questions and answers addressed by the panel from the IRS:
Q. Is this legal?
A. Yes. We have been to court several times and in all cases the judge has ruled that we should have access to the electronic books because they are the books of original entry.
Q. Could we turn off the audit function?
A. Yes but that would make us suspicious and would probably extend the audit. What are you trying to hide?
Q. What if the client uses QuickBooks as a checkbook and then the accountant takes the QuickBooks and makes entries. Can they still request?
A. Yes
Q. If the auditor has the books can he look at prior years? If he is looking at prior years he is supposed to open an audit for those years. Will they be looking at those years?
A. We have told the auditors during training not to look at prior years.
Q. HERE WAS MY QUESTION. Many clients have point of sale software that keeps track of transactions and inventory along with accounts receivable but is not downloaded into the general ledger. Is this type of software subject to review?
A. Yes. This is considered part of the books of original entry and is subject to request.
Q. What if the electronic books are kept by the accountant. Can they still be requested or subpoenaed?
A. Yes.
Because of this new initiative by the IRS, we are going to have to be more diligent in our recording into QuickBooks and other electronic software and be prepared to answer questions of why entries were made to change or to make journal entries after the end of the business year.
The IRS now can request backup copies of your software.
This is going to give them access to entries not only to your books but also it will allow the auditor to look at adjustments and changes that were made to your books by looking at the audit trail.
This is concerning. Think about yearend adjustments that are made when cleaning up the books and then when doing tax planning. The auditor is going to see those changes and will be asking questions.
Here is an example: Assume the owner of the business takes money from the business during the year. The bookkeeper classifies this as a loan. After the yearend we are looking at the transactions and determine that this actually should have been a dividend. On March 1st of the subsequent year we either make an entry or reclassify the check. The auditor is going to know about the entry through the audit function and think that we are doing some "hankie pankie" post yearend planning.
Here are some of the questions and answers addressed by the panel from the IRS:
Q. Is this legal?
A. Yes. We have been to court several times and in all cases the judge has ruled that we should have access to the electronic books because they are the books of original entry.
Q. Could we turn off the audit function?
A. Yes but that would make us suspicious and would probably extend the audit. What are you trying to hide?
Q. What if the client uses QuickBooks as a checkbook and then the accountant takes the QuickBooks and makes entries. Can they still request?
A. Yes
Q. If the auditor has the books can he look at prior years? If he is looking at prior years he is supposed to open an audit for those years. Will they be looking at those years?
A. We have told the auditors during training not to look at prior years.
Q. HERE WAS MY QUESTION. Many clients have point of sale software that keeps track of transactions and inventory along with accounts receivable but is not downloaded into the general ledger. Is this type of software subject to review?
A. Yes. This is considered part of the books of original entry and is subject to request.
Q. What if the electronic books are kept by the accountant. Can they still be requested or subpoenaed?
A. Yes.
Because of this new initiative by the IRS, we are going to have to be more diligent in our recording into QuickBooks and other electronic software and be prepared to answer questions of why entries were made to change or to make journal entries after the end of the business year.
WASHINGTON D.C. UPDATE PART #2
Independent contractors are on the radar.
- There is a new initiative to have owners that are improperly treating workers to come forward and admit their mistake. The cost would be penalty of 10% of the payroll tax due for the prior 12 months. This is an effort by the IRS to allow businesses to get it right before they start a hard clamp down on worker classification.
- The IRS is now doing an extensive study sampling worker classification
- Estimates are that $64 billion is being lost in payroll taxes by misclassification.
- Hard lobbying in Washington to eliminate the Section 530 Relief.
- Efforts by the IRS to find employers that are improperly classifying workers:
- Independent research study on the issue
- New IRS specialist to help field auditors with the issue
- More exams
- 1099/W-2 comparisons within individual industries
- Working with the states on classification. States are getting much more active.
- Flagging businesses with more than 5 1099's showing more than $20,000; thus indicating the use of independent contractors and workers.
- There is a new initiative to have owners that are improperly treating workers to come forward and admit their mistake. The cost would be penalty of 10% of the payroll tax due for the prior 12 months. This is an effort by the IRS to allow businesses to get it right before they start a hard clamp down on worker classification.
- The IRS is now doing an extensive study sampling worker classification
- Estimates are that $64 billion is being lost in payroll taxes by misclassification.
- Hard lobbying in Washington to eliminate the Section 530 Relief.
- Efforts by the IRS to find employers that are improperly classifying workers:
- Independent research study on the issue
- New IRS specialist to help field auditors with the issue
- More exams
- 1099/W-2 comparisons within individual industries
- Working with the states on classification. States are getting much more active.
- Flagging businesses with more than 5 1099's showing more than $20,000; thus indicating the use of independent contractors and workers.
WASHINGTON D.C. UPDATE PART #1
I am writing this from the National Tax Conference in Washington DC. This is a great conference because we hear from the "insiders" on what is happening, or not happening, with our tax policy. The Commissioner of the IRS even made a presentation. You may have seen his talk live on CSPAN, but come to think of it I would imagine not too many people would find his talk interesting so the ratings from CSPAN probably were not up there with Dancing With the Stars.
I wanted to share with you some highlights. This is really important because future tax policy is going to hit us right in our bank account. With taxes scheduled to increase substantially and with the economy waning the more we know the better we can plan.
Here is Part #1 of this 2 1/2 day conference:
+ Nobody can outguess what Congress is going to do. Even the “insiders” are concerned about the lack of direction.
+ We are fairly safe in planning for 2012. It is an election year so we won't see a lot of major changes. But in 2013 the Bush/Obama laws will be phased out and it is going to be a battle. If the past is any indication we may not know what the 2013 laws will be until late in the year. This is going to make planning in 2012 very important.
+ In 2011, we can take 100% write-off on certain leasehold improvements. This is scheduled to reduce to 50% in 2012 and then disappear in 2013. With the economy as it is we may see the ability to take 100% continue thru 2012- there is a chance but don't count on it. We are watching this for you.
+ The same is true with the write off of equipment. It reduces from $500,000 this year to $139,000 in 2012. This may also be extended. We are watching for you.
+ Many business owners are planning/hoping that Obama Care will be repealed. One of the Congressmen that spoke said that in his opinion it will not be repealed no matter who wins the White House. The Congressmen’s thinking is that it would take 60 Senators to overturn the bill and that will not happen.
+ The extremely high tax rates for people making over $200,000 are getting closer. With the exit of the Bush/Obama cuts; the Obama proposal to raise taxes on those wealthy people making over $250,000; and Obama Care laws tax increases for Medicare coming in 2014 rates could go as high as 43.4%. Plus we still have Social Security and State taxes ~ Ouch.
+ Everything is now political. It used to be a few years back that the leaders from the two parties would get together to work out solutions to problems. This does not happen anymore.
+ Estate planning is a mess. In 2011 and 2012 you can have an estate of $5 million and no estate tax. Any of the $5 million that you do not use you can pass to your spouse. In addition you can give $5 million. But in 2013 the estate drops to $1 million. Who knows how to plan? It may be time to consider gifting. We are watching for you. If you have an old will you should consider reviewing. It most likely is outdated.
+ We even had a session on the power of Social Media. If you are not using any type of Social Media, you better catch up with the times. People trust testimonials 90% but advertising 14%. Social media creates a testimonial "feeling."
+ Health Savings Accounts are a great way to reduce healthcare costs.
I wanted to share with you some highlights. This is really important because future tax policy is going to hit us right in our bank account. With taxes scheduled to increase substantially and with the economy waning the more we know the better we can plan.
Here is Part #1 of this 2 1/2 day conference:
+ Nobody can outguess what Congress is going to do. Even the “insiders” are concerned about the lack of direction.
+ We are fairly safe in planning for 2012. It is an election year so we won't see a lot of major changes. But in 2013 the Bush/Obama laws will be phased out and it is going to be a battle. If the past is any indication we may not know what the 2013 laws will be until late in the year. This is going to make planning in 2012 very important.
+ In 2011, we can take 100% write-off on certain leasehold improvements. This is scheduled to reduce to 50% in 2012 and then disappear in 2013. With the economy as it is we may see the ability to take 100% continue thru 2012- there is a chance but don't count on it. We are watching this for you.
+ The same is true with the write off of equipment. It reduces from $500,000 this year to $139,000 in 2012. This may also be extended. We are watching for you.
+ Many business owners are planning/hoping that Obama Care will be repealed. One of the Congressmen that spoke said that in his opinion it will not be repealed no matter who wins the White House. The Congressmen’s thinking is that it would take 60 Senators to overturn the bill and that will not happen.
+ The extremely high tax rates for people making over $200,000 are getting closer. With the exit of the Bush/Obama cuts; the Obama proposal to raise taxes on those wealthy people making over $250,000; and Obama Care laws tax increases for Medicare coming in 2014 rates could go as high as 43.4%. Plus we still have Social Security and State taxes ~ Ouch.
+ Everything is now political. It used to be a few years back that the leaders from the two parties would get together to work out solutions to problems. This does not happen anymore.
+ Estate planning is a mess. In 2011 and 2012 you can have an estate of $5 million and no estate tax. Any of the $5 million that you do not use you can pass to your spouse. In addition you can give $5 million. But in 2013 the estate drops to $1 million. Who knows how to plan? It may be time to consider gifting. We are watching for you. If you have an old will you should consider reviewing. It most likely is outdated.
+ We even had a session on the power of Social Media. If you are not using any type of Social Media, you better catch up with the times. People trust testimonials 90% but advertising 14%. Social media creates a testimonial "feeling."
+ Health Savings Accounts are a great way to reduce healthcare costs.
ACCOUNTANTS IN THE MOVIES
In Hollywood, accounting can seem like a pretty glamorous profession, or not.Danny Glover played bow-tied accountant Henry Sherman in Wes Anderson's 2001 comedy, “The Royal Tenenbaums” about an eccentric family of upper-class misfits. Besides doing the accounting, Henry also romances the matriarch of the family, Etheline Tenenbaum, played by Anjelica Huston. Other members of the all-star cast included Gene Hackman, Ben Stiller, Gwyneth Paltrow, Bill Murray, Luke Wilson and Owen Wilson, along with the voice of narrator Alec Baldwin.
Friday, November 11, 2011
FLAT TAX QUESTION
Q. Hello Larry,
Not sure if you remember me, but I attended York College and had a few of your classes in '03-'05. With all of this "flat tax" talk by Presidential candidates right now, all I could think about was my classes where you would talk about that proposed flat tax that you said if it ever became law, instead of putting you out of business you'd have more business than before because it was so complex. Anyways, I was just curious what you thought about the current suggestions (Cain's 9-9-9 and Perry recent proposal-20% or normal, etc.). Thanks for listening! ~ Samuel
A. Sam, sure I remember you. I hope all is going well. Looks like a nice accounting firm that you are with.
Regarding the 9-9-9 and Perry’s 20% Alternative I don’t see any way that those plans are anything other than campaign rhetoric. To start with, tax laws must originate in the House Ways and Means Committee not with the President. And even with that, as people start studying the plans they realize that there is not enough money in the plan to make it work.
Oh yea… I forgot … “you can take away all the deductions but don’t take away my ________________ (fill in the blank -depreciation/charitable/tax exempt interest/child tax credit/medical expense etc.)
And don’t forget what I said in class, “people want fair and simple, but in reality that does not exist. Something can be simple but usually it is not fair so to make it fair we have to make it more complex.” Law of the universe.
Keep in touch.
Not sure if you remember me, but I attended York College and had a few of your classes in '03-'05. With all of this "flat tax" talk by Presidential candidates right now, all I could think about was my classes where you would talk about that proposed flat tax that you said if it ever became law, instead of putting you out of business you'd have more business than before because it was so complex. Anyways, I was just curious what you thought about the current suggestions (Cain's 9-9-9 and Perry recent proposal-20% or normal, etc.). Thanks for listening! ~ Samuel
A. Sam, sure I remember you. I hope all is going well. Looks like a nice accounting firm that you are with.
Regarding the 9-9-9 and Perry’s 20% Alternative I don’t see any way that those plans are anything other than campaign rhetoric. To start with, tax laws must originate in the House Ways and Means Committee not with the President. And even with that, as people start studying the plans they realize that there is not enough money in the plan to make it work.
Oh yea… I forgot … “you can take away all the deductions but don’t take away my ________________ (fill in the blank -depreciation/charitable/tax exempt interest/child tax credit/medical expense etc.)
And don’t forget what I said in class, “people want fair and simple, but in reality that does not exist. Something can be simple but usually it is not fair so to make it fair we have to make it more complex.” Law of the universe.
Keep in touch.
Thursday, November 10, 2011
DEDUCTIBLE MOVING EXPENSES
Q. I am relocating to a new job in a new community. Could you give me some guidance on the tax write-offs? A. Congratulations on the new job. There are a lot of people looking for employment. Here is a primer on moving expenses:
Work Related
The move must be closely related to start of work. Generally, you can consider moving expenses incurred within one year from the date you first reported to a new location, as closely related in time to the start of work.
Distance Test
Your move meets the distance test if your new main job location is at least 50 miles farther from your former home than your previous job location was. If you are close to the 50 mile requirement check the rules closely.
Time Test
You must work full time for at least 39 weeks during the first 12 months after you arrive in the general area of your new job location, or at least 78 weeks during the first 24 months if you are self-employed. If your income tax return is due before you’ve satisfied this requirement, you can still deduct your allowable moving expenses if you expect to meet the time test in the following years.
Travel
You can deduct lodging expenses for yourself and household members while moving from your former home to your new home. You can also deduct transportation expenses, including airfare, vehicle mileage, parking fees and tolls you pay to move, but you can only deduct one trip per person.
Household goods
You can deduct the cost of packing, crating and transporting your household goods and personal property. You may be able to include the cost of storing and insuring these items while in transit.
Utilities
You can deduct the costs of connecting or disconnecting utilities. Many people miss this deduction.
Items Not Deductible
You cannot deduct as moving expenses: any part of the purchase price of your new home, car tags, drivers license, costs of buying or selling a home, expenses of entering into or breaking a lease, security deposits and storage charges except those incurred in transit.
Don't forget, if your employer reimburses you for the cost of the move, the reimbursement may have to be included on your income tax return. Also remember to update your address with the IRS and the U.S. Postal Service to ensure you receive refunds or correspondence from the IRS. Use Form 8822, Change of Address, to notify the IRS.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
PRISONERS MILK TAXPAYERS OUT OF MILLIONS
Don't ask me why but I like to study philosophy. Recently I was reading the debate about the purpose of jail. There are a bunch of different philosophies about why jailing a person is supposed to be a good idea though admittedly no consensus. Is it punishment for wrongs? A mechanism to isolate “bad” people? A way to get those who did something wrong to think about what they have done? Some combination of the above?
I’m not sure what I think the real purpose of jail is but I’m pretty sure it’s not supposed to be a forum for committing more crimes. And yet, that’s what’s allegedly happening in jails across the country.
CNN recently reported that an investigation into a scheme into a Key West, Florida has found attempts to cheat the government out of more than $1 million – on your dime. Investigators believe that inmates have been filing false tax forms using bogus Social Security numbers and made up businesses in order to collect refund checks. Instructions explaining how to fill out the forms together with cheat sheets – as well as how to keep refund request relatively low (under $5,000) – were circulated among the prisoners in a far-reaching scheme.
Most commonly, prisoners would fill out a form 4852, a form that you use to report wages when your form W-2 is missing. When the forms, along with tax returns were processed, the prisoners received bogus refunds. The refunds were mailed to family members and sometimes, even directly to the prison. At the prison, the refunds were divided among ringleaders (who kept a portion for themselves) and participants in the scheme. Genius, right?
It may not be as genius as it sounds. The scheme is actually nothing new: it’s been happening for years. The IRS has been notified and across the country, charges have been filed and ringleaders prosecuted. However, officials familiar with these cases say that the fraud is ongoing. At Key West, for example, the prison has been intercepting bogus checks still being issued by the IRS for at least one prisoner.
The IRS, for its part, says that it is aware of what’s happening. They note that it is difficult to attack the problem since being in prison doesn’t bar taxpayers from receiving a genuine refund. Even more challenging? The population of prisons is constantly changing which means that patterns may be difficult to spot.
The issue has been on the radar for years. Five years ago, the IRS flagged false refunds from prisoners as a top concern noting that of 118,000 fraudulent tax returns filed, 18,000 were filed by prisoners – that’s a whopping 15%. Prisoners received more than $14 million in bogus claims, though the IRS points out that they successfully blocked an additional $53 million.
The IRS won’t say what steps they are taking to control the number of bogus claims filed by prisoners but they do know who is to blame: you. Reportedly IRS’ position is to issue refunds and then audit later in response to a bigger problem: taxpayers want their refunds quickly. Increased scrutiny of returns at the processing level (while clearly more efficient) would slow down the refund process. And that wouldn’t be popular for taxpayers who want to see refunds.
I’m not sure what I think the real purpose of jail is but I’m pretty sure it’s not supposed to be a forum for committing more crimes. And yet, that’s what’s allegedly happening in jails across the country.
CNN recently reported that an investigation into a scheme into a Key West, Florida has found attempts to cheat the government out of more than $1 million – on your dime. Investigators believe that inmates have been filing false tax forms using bogus Social Security numbers and made up businesses in order to collect refund checks. Instructions explaining how to fill out the forms together with cheat sheets – as well as how to keep refund request relatively low (under $5,000) – were circulated among the prisoners in a far-reaching scheme.
Most commonly, prisoners would fill out a form 4852, a form that you use to report wages when your form W-2 is missing. When the forms, along with tax returns were processed, the prisoners received bogus refunds. The refunds were mailed to family members and sometimes, even directly to the prison. At the prison, the refunds were divided among ringleaders (who kept a portion for themselves) and participants in the scheme. Genius, right?
It may not be as genius as it sounds. The scheme is actually nothing new: it’s been happening for years. The IRS has been notified and across the country, charges have been filed and ringleaders prosecuted. However, officials familiar with these cases say that the fraud is ongoing. At Key West, for example, the prison has been intercepting bogus checks still being issued by the IRS for at least one prisoner.
The IRS, for its part, says that it is aware of what’s happening. They note that it is difficult to attack the problem since being in prison doesn’t bar taxpayers from receiving a genuine refund. Even more challenging? The population of prisons is constantly changing which means that patterns may be difficult to spot.
The issue has been on the radar for years. Five years ago, the IRS flagged false refunds from prisoners as a top concern noting that of 118,000 fraudulent tax returns filed, 18,000 were filed by prisoners – that’s a whopping 15%. Prisoners received more than $14 million in bogus claims, though the IRS points out that they successfully blocked an additional $53 million.
The IRS won’t say what steps they are taking to control the number of bogus claims filed by prisoners but they do know who is to blame: you. Reportedly IRS’ position is to issue refunds and then audit later in response to a bigger problem: taxpayers want their refunds quickly. Increased scrutiny of returns at the processing level (while clearly more efficient) would slow down the refund process. And that wouldn’t be popular for taxpayers who want to see refunds.
ACCOUNTANTS IN THE MOVIES
In Hollywood, accounting can seem like a pretty glamorous profession, or not.
Joe Pesci plays accountant Leo Getz, who is protected by cops Danny Glover and Mel Gibson after he become a witness against his money-laundering clients in three of the four "Lethal Weapon" action-comedy movies. Leo continually gets his bodyguards in trouble, but he seems to be having a lot more fun than doing the books. By the final movie, he went through a career change and became a private detective.
Joe Pesci plays accountant Leo Getz, who is protected by cops Danny Glover and Mel Gibson after he become a witness against his money-laundering clients in three of the four "Lethal Weapon" action-comedy movies. Leo continually gets his bodyguards in trouble, but he seems to be having a lot more fun than doing the books. By the final movie, he went through a career change and became a private detective.
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
SOCIAL SECURITY DISASTER
Twenty one years ago, I did a tax seminar and my main theme was not income tax savings but rather Social Security savings. I was concerned way back then about the financial feasibility of the program. The point is that the Social Security problem is not something that is new. We knew way back then it was projected that by 2025, there would be two workers for every worker on Social Security.
We started doing everything we could to avoid paying in because the system is not set up so that the more you pay in the more you get out.
Unfortunately, I was correct way back then. It was political suicide to change the system so the politicians just kicked the can to the next guy/girl in office.
The following article is a really good summary:
Politicians who are principled enough to point out the fraud of Social Security, referring to it as a lie and Ponzi scheme, are under siege. Acknowledgment of Social Security's problems is not the same as calling for the abandonment of its recipients. Instead, it's a call to take actions now, while there's time to avert a disaster. Let's look at it.
The term “Ponzi” was derived from the scheme created during the 1920s by Charles Ponzi, a poor but enterprising Italian immigrant. Here's how it works. You persuade some people to give you their money to invest. After a while, you pay them a nice return, but the return doesn't come from investments. What you pay them with comes from the money of other people whom you've persuaded to "invest" in your scheme. The scheme works so long as you can persuade greater and greater numbers of people to "invest" so that you can pay off earlier "investors." After a while, Ponzi couldn't find enough new investors, and his scheme collapsed. He was convicted of fraud and sent to prison.
The very first Social Security check went to Ida May Fuller in 1940. She paid just $24.75 in Social Security taxes but collected a total of $22,888.92 in benefits, getting back all she put into Social Security in a month. According to a Congressional Research Service report titled "Social Security Reform" (October 2002), by Geoffrey Kollmann and Dawn Nuschler, workers who retired in 1980 at age 65 got back all they put into Social Security, plus interest, in 2.8 years. Workers who retired at age 65 in 2002 will have to wait a total of 16.9 years to break even. For those retiring in 2020, it will take 20.9 years. Workers entering the labor force today won't live long enough to get back even half of what they will put into Social Security. Social Security faces Ponzi's problem, not enough new "investors." In 1940, there were 160 workers paying into Social Security per retiree; today there are only 2.9 and falling.
Some politicians claim that Social Security has a huge trust fund and is in good health. An uniformed public and a derelict news media don't challenge that lie. Back in August, politicians were in a tizzy over raising the federal debt limit. In an effort to frighten seniors, President Barack Obama said in a CBS interview, "I cannot guarantee that those checks go out on Aug. 3 if we haven't resolved this issue, because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it." Here's how we reveal the trust fund lie: According to the Social Security Administration, it has a trust fund with $2.6 trillion in it. If those were real assets, then the Social Security Administration could have mailed checks out regardless of what Congress did about the debt limit. The reality is that the Social Security trust fund consists of government IOUs that have no real value at all and probably are not even worth the paper upon which they are printed.
I believe that a person who is 65 years old and has been forced into Social Security is owed something. But the question is- Who owes it to him? Congress has spent every penny of his Social Security "contribution." Young workers have no obligation to be fleeced in order to make up for the dishonesty and dereliction of Congress. The tragedy is that most seniors just want their money and couldn't care less about whom Congress takes it from.
We started doing everything we could to avoid paying in because the system is not set up so that the more you pay in the more you get out.
Unfortunately, I was correct way back then. It was political suicide to change the system so the politicians just kicked the can to the next guy/girl in office.
The following article is a really good summary:
Politicians who are principled enough to point out the fraud of Social Security, referring to it as a lie and Ponzi scheme, are under siege. Acknowledgment of Social Security's problems is not the same as calling for the abandonment of its recipients. Instead, it's a call to take actions now, while there's time to avert a disaster. Let's look at it.
The term “Ponzi” was derived from the scheme created during the 1920s by Charles Ponzi, a poor but enterprising Italian immigrant. Here's how it works. You persuade some people to give you their money to invest. After a while, you pay them a nice return, but the return doesn't come from investments. What you pay them with comes from the money of other people whom you've persuaded to "invest" in your scheme. The scheme works so long as you can persuade greater and greater numbers of people to "invest" so that you can pay off earlier "investors." After a while, Ponzi couldn't find enough new investors, and his scheme collapsed. He was convicted of fraud and sent to prison.
The very first Social Security check went to Ida May Fuller in 1940. She paid just $24.75 in Social Security taxes but collected a total of $22,888.92 in benefits, getting back all she put into Social Security in a month. According to a Congressional Research Service report titled "Social Security Reform" (October 2002), by Geoffrey Kollmann and Dawn Nuschler, workers who retired in 1980 at age 65 got back all they put into Social Security, plus interest, in 2.8 years. Workers who retired at age 65 in 2002 will have to wait a total of 16.9 years to break even. For those retiring in 2020, it will take 20.9 years. Workers entering the labor force today won't live long enough to get back even half of what they will put into Social Security. Social Security faces Ponzi's problem, not enough new "investors." In 1940, there were 160 workers paying into Social Security per retiree; today there are only 2.9 and falling.
Some politicians claim that Social Security has a huge trust fund and is in good health. An uniformed public and a derelict news media don't challenge that lie. Back in August, politicians were in a tizzy over raising the federal debt limit. In an effort to frighten seniors, President Barack Obama said in a CBS interview, "I cannot guarantee that those checks go out on Aug. 3 if we haven't resolved this issue, because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it." Here's how we reveal the trust fund lie: According to the Social Security Administration, it has a trust fund with $2.6 trillion in it. If those were real assets, then the Social Security Administration could have mailed checks out regardless of what Congress did about the debt limit. The reality is that the Social Security trust fund consists of government IOUs that have no real value at all and probably are not even worth the paper upon which they are printed.
I believe that a person who is 65 years old and has been forced into Social Security is owed something. But the question is- Who owes it to him? Congress has spent every penny of his Social Security "contribution." Young workers have no obligation to be fleeced in order to make up for the dishonesty and dereliction of Congress. The tragedy is that most seniors just want their money and couldn't care less about whom Congress takes it from.
Friday, November 4, 2011
U.S. SOCIAL SECURITY GOES "CASH NEGATIVE"
Social Security will add $46 billion to the U.S. budget problem this year, a figure that would increase to $267 billion if Congress adopts President Barack Obama's proposal to expand this year's tax break into 2012, according to the system's trustees. Congressional leaders of both parties are avoiding the issue, fearful of angering senior citizens and their advocates.
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
TAXING YOUR AIRLINE TICKET
You may soon be paying more in taxes than the cost of the airline ticket -
The Obama administration wants to add a giant tax to your next airline ticket. The government is proposing a $100-per-takeoff tax for passenger and cargo flights to reduce the federal budget deficit. And Congress is considering increasing the $2.50 per passenger security tax to $5 and then raising it again to $7.50 by 2017. The airlines currently pay up to 17 different taxes to government entities (actually you pay in the form of higher ticket prices). This one might be killing the goose that lays the golden egg. Can you imagine buying a ticket from Omaha to Chicago for $79 and then paying taxes of $200 on top of that. The government taxes airlines more than they tax sin (alcohol and tobacco). Let's hope that this tax proposal dies a fast death in congress.
The Obama administration wants to add a giant tax to your next airline ticket. The government is proposing a $100-per-takeoff tax for passenger and cargo flights to reduce the federal budget deficit. And Congress is considering increasing the $2.50 per passenger security tax to $5 and then raising it again to $7.50 by 2017. The airlines currently pay up to 17 different taxes to government entities (actually you pay in the form of higher ticket prices). This one might be killing the goose that lays the golden egg. Can you imagine buying a ticket from Omaha to Chicago for $79 and then paying taxes of $200 on top of that. The government taxes airlines more than they tax sin (alcohol and tobacco). Let's hope that this tax proposal dies a fast death in congress.
ACCOUNTANTS IN THE MOVIES
In Hollywood, accounting can seem like a pretty glamorous profession, or not.The opening sequence in the 1983 comedy, "Monty Python's The Meaning of Life," is a short movie called "The Crimson Permanent Assurance," in which a group of beleaguered British chartered accountants decides to fight their corporate overlords by turning into pirates and sailing off on the high seas of accountancy. "It's fun to charter an accountant and sail the wide accountant-sea," the pirates sing.
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT INCREASE FOR 2012
Social Security benefits will go up 3.6% in 2012...the first hike in two years. The earnings limits will be heading up, too. Individuals who turn 66 in 2012 will not lose any benefits if they earn $38,880 or less before they reach that age. Individuals between ages 62 and 66 by the end of 2012 can make up to $14,640 before they lose any benefits. There is no earnings cap once a beneficiary turns 66.
For more information on Social Security: Click Here
For more information on Social Security: Click Here
Monday, October 31, 2011
CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM IRAS
Year-end planning Tip: Individuals age 70 1/2 or older should consider making charitable contributions from IRAs
This year may well be the last chance for taxpayers age 70 1/2 or older to take advantage of an up-to-$100,000 annual exclusion from gross income for otherwise taxable individual retirement account (IRA) distributions that are qualified charitable distributions. Such distributions aren't subject to the charitable contribution percentage limits and aren't includible in gross income. This tax advantage will not be available for distributions made in tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2011.
This is a great opportunity for taxpayers that do not have enough itemized deductions to file the “long form.” For married couples over age 65 the standard deduction is $13,900 and for singles it is $7,250.
Where this becomes a great planning tool is when the taxpayer is in the zone where they are paying tax of Social Security Benefits and making charitable contributions that they effectively can’t deduct because they are taking the standard deduction.
For example:
Bonnie and Clyde are both over age 70 ½. They have interest and other income of $20,000 and are taking $10,000 per year from their IRA. In addition they have Social Security benefits of $20,000. Bonnie and Clyde got religion after they retired from the banking business and annually make charitable contributions of $7,500.
If they draw money from their IRA and put it in their checking account and then make a charitable contribution their total federal and state tax is $1,703.
On the other hand if they direct their IRA administrator to take the IRA money of $7,500 and give it to their charity their tax drops to $176.
There is a saving so $1,527. Pretty cool… easier than robbing a bank.
If you need any more information on this let me know. Remember, unless Congress renews this tax strategy 2011 is your last chance. You might want to think about doing your 2012 contribution in 2011 to beat the expiration deadline.
This year may well be the last chance for taxpayers age 70 1/2 or older to take advantage of an up-to-$100,000 annual exclusion from gross income for otherwise taxable individual retirement account (IRA) distributions that are qualified charitable distributions. Such distributions aren't subject to the charitable contribution percentage limits and aren't includible in gross income. This tax advantage will not be available for distributions made in tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2011.
This is a great opportunity for taxpayers that do not have enough itemized deductions to file the “long form.” For married couples over age 65 the standard deduction is $13,900 and for singles it is $7,250.
Where this becomes a great planning tool is when the taxpayer is in the zone where they are paying tax of Social Security Benefits and making charitable contributions that they effectively can’t deduct because they are taking the standard deduction.
For example:
Bonnie and Clyde are both over age 70 ½. They have interest and other income of $20,000 and are taking $10,000 per year from their IRA. In addition they have Social Security benefits of $20,000. Bonnie and Clyde got religion after they retired from the banking business and annually make charitable contributions of $7,500.
If they draw money from their IRA and put it in their checking account and then make a charitable contribution their total federal and state tax is $1,703.
On the other hand if they direct their IRA administrator to take the IRA money of $7,500 and give it to their charity their tax drops to $176.
There is a saving so $1,527. Pretty cool… easier than robbing a bank.
If you need any more information on this let me know. Remember, unless Congress renews this tax strategy 2011 is your last chance. You might want to think about doing your 2012 contribution in 2011 to beat the expiration deadline.
THE IOWA PUMPKIN TAX REPEALED
Here is how stupid taxes can be. It is estimated that more 750 million pumpkins are carved into jack o' lanterns each October. While the practice brings joy to many, it created heartburn for Iowa tax officials four years ago, who were dismayed that so many people were decorating their pumpkins.You see, Iowa (like most states) taxes retail sales but exempts groceries. Pumpkins used for decoration should have been taxed but were slipping by because they were also food. So they spent taxpayer’s money sending out a bulletin to retailers reminding them to quiz customers on whether they were buying the pumpkin to eat (not taxable) or decorate (taxable):
Pumpkins: Pies and jack-o'-lanterns
The Department recently refined its position on whether pumpkins are subject to Iowa sales tax to more closely match what we believe to be their predominant use.
In the past, pumpkins were exempt from sales tax as a food (edible squash), even if they were to be later made into jack-o'-lanterns or used as decorations.
Our position now is that pumpkins are taxable if:
1. They are advertised to be used as jack-o'-lanterns/decorations, or
2. It is understood that they will be used as jack-o'-lanterns/decorations
Pumpkins are exempt in the following circumstances:
* The buyer completes a sales tax exemption certificate stating they will be used as food, or
* The pumpkins are a specific variety used to make pumpkin pies and are advertised in that way, or
* They are purchased with Food Stamps.
Retailers who sell pumpkins should keep these guidelines in mind and make any necessary changes to their tax treatment of pumpkin sales.
Fortunately this got picked up by the media and then the blogosphere, which led to local news coverage, and finally Iowa officials rescinded the pumpkin tax a few days later.
One less silly tax.
Friday, October 28, 2011
ACCOUNTANTS IN THE MOVIES
In Hollywood, accounting can seem like a pretty glamorous profession, or not.Edmund O'Brien plays accountant Frank Bigelow in the fast-paced 1950 film noir crime drama "D.O.A." The movie opens with Bigelow entering a police station to report his own homicide and then in flashback traces how he came to learn that he had been poisoned by a former client who needed him to notarize an incriminating document. The movie was later remade in 1988 with Dennis Quaid playing O'Brien's role, but in the remake Quaid is a college professor. O'Brien is shown here with Laurette Luez, who plays his client's mistress Marla Rakubian.
Thursday, October 27, 2011
SCHOOL UNIFORMS
Q. As a mom, I love school uniforms. They’re easy and predictable. What they aren’t is cheap. They’re also not in great demand for wear outside of school which means that they serve one purpose only. So that feels like an expense that should be deductible, right?
A. Sorry, nondeductible. The IRS does not allow deductions for school uniforms, even if required, for public, parochial or private schools.
The rules are a bit different at military school. If you are a student at an armed forces academy, you cannot deduct the cost of your uniforms – that’s consistent with the rules for public, parochial and private schools. However, you do get something of a break at military school in that you can deduct the cost of insignia, shoulder boards, and related items.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
SOCIAL SECURITY WAGE BASE INCREASES
Social Security wage base increases to $110,100 for 2012
For those of you that are budgeting, the IRS has released the new base for Social Security tax. If you are at max this will mean an additional $205 tax ($3,300 x .062). For self employed double that.
The Social Security Administration has announced that the wage base for computing the Social Security tax (OASDI) in 2012 increases to $110,100 from $106,800, which was the wage base for 2009 through 2011. The $3,300 increase, which is about 3%, is due to an increase in average total wages.
For those of you that are budgeting, the IRS has released the new base for Social Security tax. If you are at max this will mean an additional $205 tax ($3,300 x .062). For self employed double that.
The Social Security Administration has announced that the wage base for computing the Social Security tax (OASDI) in 2012 increases to $110,100 from $106,800, which was the wage base for 2009 through 2011. The $3,300 increase, which is about 3%, is due to an increase in average total wages.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
NOTIFY THE IRS IF YOU MOVE
The IRS has explained how taxpayers must inform, the IRS of a change of address, effective immediately. The IRS uses a taxpayer's address of record for the various notices or documents that are required to be sent to a taxpayer's “last known address.”
The key point is that a notice or document sent to a taxpayer's “last known address” is legally effective even if the taxpayer never receives it.
The key point is that a notice or document sent to a taxpayer's “last known address” is legally effective even if the taxpayer never receives it.
Saturday, October 22, 2011
HMMMM
“Warren Buffett’s company reportedly owes the IRS a billion dollars in back taxes. When he said he wasn't paying enough taxes, he wasn't kidding.” Jay Leno
Friday, October 21, 2011
NO WONDER WE HAVE A DEFICIT
In 1969 20% of US Taxpayers Paid Zero or Negative Tax
In 2009 42%
Now 51%
(Tax Foundation) -- The Tax Foundation's Tax Policy Blog reports that from 1969 to 2009, U.S. taxpayers who have a zero or negative tax liability grew from less than 20% of all filers to 42%, according to the IRS. Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation has "found that 51% of American households paid no income taxes." For millions of these non-payers, "the refundable credits more than exceed their payroll tax contributions." The blog also notes that since 2003, the top 1% of taxpayers' share of the tax burden "has well exceeded that of the bottom 90%, even during the recent recession."
In 2009 42%
Now 51%
(Tax Foundation) -- The Tax Foundation's Tax Policy Blog reports that from 1969 to 2009, U.S. taxpayers who have a zero or negative tax liability grew from less than 20% of all filers to 42%, according to the IRS. Congress' Joint Committee on Taxation has "found that 51% of American households paid no income taxes." For millions of these non-payers, "the refundable credits more than exceed their payroll tax contributions." The blog also notes that since 2003, the top 1% of taxpayers' share of the tax burden "has well exceeded that of the bottom 90%, even during the recent recession."
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
MAN AGAINST MACHINES
It’s technologies fault that we have so much unemployment
A couple of years ago, I was making a presentation to a group of about 250 CPA’s, Certified Public Accountants. Before the talk I was back stage with one of the other presenters. This guy was from one of the big CPA firms and had just returned from working in Europe for one of his tax clients.
During my conversation I asked him about technology in Europe. In his words, “Europe has not embraced technology because it doesn’t do them any good.” It seems that In Europe you can’t lay anybody off so there is no incentive to use computers when they still need to have the people there. I was thinking about that conversation recently as I watched six or seven workers outside my office window tearing up a street and laying new cement. There weren’t many workers walking around with shovels, they were utilizing big machines and technology to build the new road. Anything that needed to be moved was done with a backhoe or a frontend loader. I don’t think I ever saw over ten workers and that was when they were pouring cement. So even “shovel ready” jobs are not going to create a lot of jobs unless they mandate that everything be done by hand.
Actually President Obama was right when he said that ATM’s were part of the employment problem. You don’t need tellers if people are using ATM’s.
Recently I read in Reuters that since 1999 business investment in equipment and software has surged 33% while the total number of people employed by private firms (not the government) has changed very little. The gap between man and machine widened even further in 2008 and 2009 during the recession. You can see why the United States is struggling to bring down employment which is stuck at 9%. I know my clients that went through the 2008 and 2009 recession have not significantly increased their number of employees because they are able to get by with the people they have.
Here is a personal example: I know that in our small accounting office we have 20 to 25 people employed depending on the time of year. I estimate that if we did not have computers and software and two or three monitors on everybody’s desk and internet access, etc. we would need fifty to seventy-five people to do the same amount of work we are doing right now. We used to have one person who worked part-time, just updating our paper tax library. Right now our tax library is out on the cloud and we don’t need that person working part-time. The same is true with our mail room and our filing. Everything is electronically filed.
I guess this is progress and we have to wait for the workforce to get caught up to the progress. I think we can see that it’s more than just the economy that is causing the problem with unemployment.
A couple of years ago, I was making a presentation to a group of about 250 CPA’s, Certified Public Accountants. Before the talk I was back stage with one of the other presenters. This guy was from one of the big CPA firms and had just returned from working in Europe for one of his tax clients.
During my conversation I asked him about technology in Europe. In his words, “Europe has not embraced technology because it doesn’t do them any good.” It seems that In Europe you can’t lay anybody off so there is no incentive to use computers when they still need to have the people there. I was thinking about that conversation recently as I watched six or seven workers outside my office window tearing up a street and laying new cement. There weren’t many workers walking around with shovels, they were utilizing big machines and technology to build the new road. Anything that needed to be moved was done with a backhoe or a frontend loader. I don’t think I ever saw over ten workers and that was when they were pouring cement. So even “shovel ready” jobs are not going to create a lot of jobs unless they mandate that everything be done by hand.
Actually President Obama was right when he said that ATM’s were part of the employment problem. You don’t need tellers if people are using ATM’s.
Recently I read in Reuters that since 1999 business investment in equipment and software has surged 33% while the total number of people employed by private firms (not the government) has changed very little. The gap between man and machine widened even further in 2008 and 2009 during the recession. You can see why the United States is struggling to bring down employment which is stuck at 9%. I know my clients that went through the 2008 and 2009 recession have not significantly increased their number of employees because they are able to get by with the people they have.
Here is a personal example: I know that in our small accounting office we have 20 to 25 people employed depending on the time of year. I estimate that if we did not have computers and software and two or three monitors on everybody’s desk and internet access, etc. we would need fifty to seventy-five people to do the same amount of work we are doing right now. We used to have one person who worked part-time, just updating our paper tax library. Right now our tax library is out on the cloud and we don’t need that person working part-time. The same is true with our mail room and our filing. Everything is electronically filed.
I guess this is progress and we have to wait for the workforce to get caught up to the progress. I think we can see that it’s more than just the economy that is causing the problem with unemployment.
ACCOUNTANTS IN THE MOVIES
In Hollywood, accounting can seem like a pretty glamorous profession, or not.Charles Martin Smith (far right) played accountant Oscar Wallace in the 1987 movie version of "The Untouchables," a popular TV series that ran from 1959-1963. Wallace joins a team organized by Treasury agent Elliot Ness, played by Kevin Costner, to break up Al Capone's mob in Prohibition-era Chicago. They finally put Capone behind bars for tax evasion. Capone was played by Robert De Niro. Other members of Ness's Untouchables included Sean Connery and Andy Garcia. Wallace was based on a real-life accountant named Frank J. Wilson who joined the Treasury Department's Intelligence Unit in 1920 and later helped nab Lindbergh baby kidnapper Bruno Hauptmann by insisting that the serial numbers on the ransom money be properly recorded. Wilson later became chief of the Secret Service.
Monday, October 17, 2011
RAFFLE WINNER
Q. We were at a local fundraising event and won a raffle. The prize was a trip to Vail, CO. including airfare and lodging for seven nights. The value is estimated at $12,000 to $18,000. Is the prize taxable?
A. You win... and of course the IRS wins. This is taxable and you most likely be receiving a 1099 for this. If the trip is valued at $12,000 at a 40% tax rate, you will be paying about $4,800 in income taxes on your 2011 tax return for this.
Enjoy the trip.
A. You win... and of course the IRS wins. This is taxable and you most likely be receiving a 1099 for this. If the trip is valued at $12,000 at a 40% tax rate, you will be paying about $4,800 in income taxes on your 2011 tax return for this.
Enjoy the trip.
Friday, October 14, 2011
ORDERING A PIZZA?
This is absolutely hilarious, but the scary part about it is that it's probably not too far away from being reality.Click Here
Turn up the volume. . Listen closely. ..Watch the pointer!
Thursday, October 13, 2011
PROTESTS ON WALL STREET
Maybe this is too political but.... this past summer I read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand. The book explores a dystopian US where leading innovators refuse to to be exploited by society. The protagonist sees society collapse around her as the government asserts control over all industry while the most productive citizens progressively disappear.
As I watch the protests on Wall Street and the ones spreading across the country, I thought of this book and the following statements. If anybody that reads this understands what the protesters are trying to get across would you please email me so that maybe I can understand.
Here are the concepts that I pulled out of my quotes bag.
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.
As I watch the protests on Wall Street and the ones spreading across the country, I thought of this book and the following statements. If anybody that reads this understands what the protesters are trying to get across would you please email me so that maybe I can understand.
Here are the concepts that I pulled out of my quotes bag.
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.
ACCOUNTANTS IN THE MOVIES
In Hollywood, accounting can seem like a pretty glamorous profession, or not.Will Ferrell plays lonely IRS agent Harold Crick in the 2006 comedy-drama "Stranger Than Fiction." Harold has been assigned to audit Maggie Gyllenhaal, and falls in love with her. However, he keeps hearing a strange British-sounding voice in his head, and he discovers it's author Emma Thompson, whom he tracks down through her tax records. Turns out she has been writing about his life and trying to decide how he will die in her next book.
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
FISCAL YEAR QUESTION
Q. I have a question if you can help me. I have a new LLC created on earlier this year. I applied IRS online for EIN. Calendar year is a default on this so I have to elect Fiscal year now with form 1128. My question is can I elect 6/30 year end although even though my business started in May of 2011? ~ Thanks
A. First of all, you really shouldn’t be setting up new business entities without the assistance of a qualified adviser. It is too easy to make mistakes that may be impossible to remedy .
There are a couple of rookie mistakes that an experienced tax pro would have alerted you to.
First, if you are choosing to have your LLC taxed as a C corp., you can choose the end of any month to be its fiscal year-end, regardless of when it was chartered.
For example, if you want June 30 to be the fiscal year-end, that’s your right to choose. You would need to file the initial 1120 covering all of the activity for the period from your startup in May through 6/30/11. This 1120 or an extension (Form 7004), would have been due 9/15/11. You need to file that 1120 even if no actual activity took place or IRS will assume that you made millions of dollars.
When you have a brand new C corp., it has no set fiscal year-end, so the initial 1120 becomes the official notification to the IRS of that fact. This is even if you used December 31 on the SS-4.
Secondly, you do not need to file Form 1128 to designate the tax year for a new corp. that has not filed any 1120s.
A. First of all, you really shouldn’t be setting up new business entities without the assistance of a qualified adviser. It is too easy to make mistakes that may be impossible to remedy .
There are a couple of rookie mistakes that an experienced tax pro would have alerted you to.
First, if you are choosing to have your LLC taxed as a C corp., you can choose the end of any month to be its fiscal year-end, regardless of when it was chartered.
For example, if you want June 30 to be the fiscal year-end, that’s your right to choose. You would need to file the initial 1120 covering all of the activity for the period from your startup in May through 6/30/11. This 1120 or an extension (Form 7004), would have been due 9/15/11. You need to file that 1120 even if no actual activity took place or IRS will assume that you made millions of dollars.
When you have a brand new C corp., it has no set fiscal year-end, so the initial 1120 becomes the official notification to the IRS of that fact. This is even if you used December 31 on the SS-4.
Secondly, you do not need to file Form 1128 to designate the tax year for a new corp. that has not filed any 1120s.
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
TEN TAX TIPS FOR INDIVIDUALS SELLING THEIR HOME
The Internal Revenue Service has some important information to share with individuals who have sold or are about to sell their home. If you have a gain from the sale of your main home, you may qualify to exclude all or part of that gain from your income. Here are ten tips from the IRS to keep in mind when selling your home.
1. In general, you are eligible to exclude the gain from income if you have owned and used your home as your main home for two years out of the five years prior to the date of its sale.
2. If you have a gain from the sale of your main home, you may be able to exclude up to $250,000 of the gain from your income ($500,000 on a joint return in most cases).
3. You are not eligible for the exclusion if you excluded the gain from the sale of another home during the two-year period prior to the sale of your home.
4. If you can exclude all of the gain, you do not need to report the sale on your tax return.
5. If you have a gain that cannot be excluded, it is taxable. You must report it on Form 1040, Schedule D, Capital Gains and Losses.
6. You cannot deduct a loss from the sale of your main home.
7. Worksheets are included in Publication 523, Selling Your Home, to help you figure the adjusted basis of the home you sold, the gain (or loss) on the sale, and the gain that you can exclude.
8. If you have more than one home, you can exclude a gain only from the sale of your main home. You must pay tax on the gain from selling any other home. If you have two homes and live in both of them, your main home is ordinarily the one you live in most of the time.
9. If you received the first-time homebuyer credit and within 36 months of the date of purchase, the property is no longer used as your principal residence, you are required to repay the credit. Repayment of the full credit is due with the income tax return for the year the home ceased to be your principal residence, using Form 5405, First-Time Homebuyer Credit and Repayment of the Credit. The full amount of the credit is reflected as additional tax on that year’s tax return.
10. When you move, be sure to update your address with the IRS and the U.S. Postal Service to ensure you receive refunds or correspondence from the IRS. Use Form 8822, Change of Address, to notify the IRS of your address change.
1. In general, you are eligible to exclude the gain from income if you have owned and used your home as your main home for two years out of the five years prior to the date of its sale.
2. If you have a gain from the sale of your main home, you may be able to exclude up to $250,000 of the gain from your income ($500,000 on a joint return in most cases).
3. You are not eligible for the exclusion if you excluded the gain from the sale of another home during the two-year period prior to the sale of your home.
4. If you can exclude all of the gain, you do not need to report the sale on your tax return.
5. If you have a gain that cannot be excluded, it is taxable. You must report it on Form 1040, Schedule D, Capital Gains and Losses.
6. You cannot deduct a loss from the sale of your main home.
7. Worksheets are included in Publication 523, Selling Your Home, to help you figure the adjusted basis of the home you sold, the gain (or loss) on the sale, and the gain that you can exclude.
8. If you have more than one home, you can exclude a gain only from the sale of your main home. You must pay tax on the gain from selling any other home. If you have two homes and live in both of them, your main home is ordinarily the one you live in most of the time.
9. If you received the first-time homebuyer credit and within 36 months of the date of purchase, the property is no longer used as your principal residence, you are required to repay the credit. Repayment of the full credit is due with the income tax return for the year the home ceased to be your principal residence, using Form 5405, First-Time Homebuyer Credit and Repayment of the Credit. The full amount of the credit is reflected as additional tax on that year’s tax return.
10. When you move, be sure to update your address with the IRS and the U.S. Postal Service to ensure you receive refunds or correspondence from the IRS. Use Form 8822, Change of Address, to notify the IRS of your address change.
Friday, October 7, 2011
FACT-CHECKING WARREN BUFFETT
Here is an article from the Tax Foundation. They are trying to figure where the Oracle of Omaha get’s his numbers. ~ Larry
Warren Buffett's much-discussed op-ed arguing that high-income earners aren't paying enough taxes makes the following claim:
"Last year my federal tax bill — the income tax I paid, as well as payroll taxes paid by me and on my behalf — was $6,938,744. That sounds like a lot of money. But what I paid was only 17.4 percent of my taxable income — and that’s actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent and averaged 36 percent."
To me, the effective rates he claims for other workers in his office seem too high to be realistic, and I can't figure out how he calculated them, even if you include all payroll (employee and employer) taxes. Even if you assume the scenario that leads to the highest possible tax burden (single filer, no deductions), a taxpayer would have to make at least $285,388 (in 2010) before his or her effective rate reaches 33 percent. 41 percent is impossible, as far as I can tell: the limit of total taxes over total income, as income approaches infinity, is 37.358%. That's the highest possible effective rate anyone could have paid in 2010, if you include income and all payroll taxes.
To demonstrate this, I've made a little calculator which shows the maximum possible effective rate for any income amount. Try it out on the Tax Foundation website.
Warren Buffett's much-discussed op-ed arguing that high-income earners aren't paying enough taxes makes the following claim:
"Last year my federal tax bill — the income tax I paid, as well as payroll taxes paid by me and on my behalf — was $6,938,744. That sounds like a lot of money. But what I paid was only 17.4 percent of my taxable income — and that’s actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent and averaged 36 percent."
To me, the effective rates he claims for other workers in his office seem too high to be realistic, and I can't figure out how he calculated them, even if you include all payroll (employee and employer) taxes. Even if you assume the scenario that leads to the highest possible tax burden (single filer, no deductions), a taxpayer would have to make at least $285,388 (in 2010) before his or her effective rate reaches 33 percent. 41 percent is impossible, as far as I can tell: the limit of total taxes over total income, as income approaches infinity, is 37.358%. That's the highest possible effective rate anyone could have paid in 2010, if you include income and all payroll taxes.
To demonstrate this, I've made a little calculator which shows the maximum possible effective rate for any income amount. Try it out on the Tax Foundation website.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
