New Jobs Act brings tax benefits
On Monday, September 27, the president signed the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (H.R. 5297). Among its provisions:
• §179 expanded: For tax years beginning in 2010 and 2011, expense limit is increased to $500,000 and phaseout threshold increased to $2 million;
• §179 for (some) real estate: For tax years beginning in 2010 and 2011, taxpayers can elect to treat certain real estate as §179-eligible. Qualifying real estate includes:
o Qualified leasehold improvements;
o Qualified restaurant property; and
o Qualified retail improvement property.
• Bonus depreciation extended: Available for property purchased through December 31, 2010;
• Luxury auto depreciation increased: As a result of the extension of bonus depreciation, first-year depreciation of automobiles is bumped up $8,000;
• Deduction for start-up expenditures increased: Under IRC §195, increased from $5,000 to $10,000 for taxable years beginning in 2010 (only);
• Exclusion for small business stock: For purchases made after the date of enactment and before January 1, 2011, the exclusion for small business stock under IRC §1202 is increased to 100%;
• Five-year carryback for general business credits: Effective for credits determined in the taxpayer’s first taxable year beginning after December 31, 2009 (one year only), the carryback period for an “eligible small business” is increased from one to five years. In addition, the credit is not subject to the AMT limitation;
• Built-in gain period shortened to five years: For taxable years beginning in 2011 (only), the recognition period for the BIG tax is shortened to five years;
• Deduction for health insurance for SECA purposes: For 2010 (only), the deduction for self-employed health insurance is also a deduction for purposes of the SE tax;
• Cell phones removed from listed property: Permanent and effective for tax years ending after 2009;
• Information reporting required for rental property: Effective for payments made after December 31, 2010, rental real estate is treated as a trade or business for information reporting purposes. IRS to prescribe de minimis exceptions;
• Higher information return penalties: Penalties under IRC §6721 are substantially increased beginning in 2011; §457 plans can include Roth accounts: For tax years beginning after December 31, 2010; and Rollovers from elective deferral plans to in-plan Roth accounts allowed: Effective on the date of enactment. Will allow a two-year deferral (2011 and 2012) for rollovers done in 2010.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Friday, September 24, 2010
Bipartisan Poll Highlights Small Business Concerns Regarding Health Care Law
I thought that you might be interested in a new health care small business poll. This poll goes right along with what I am hearing from our clients.
Larry Kopsa CPA
(The FINANCIAL) -- FinChannel.com reports, "Six months after enactment of the new health reform law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has released a national bipartisan poll of 590 small business leaders." The survey finds nearly 80% of small business leaders "expect their costs to increase as a result of the new law, and a majority say they will be less likely to hire new employees and more likely to reduce current health care benefits."
The survey also finds that "regardless of whether the business is 20 employees or 200 employees, at least 75% of small business leaders across all sizes expected their costs to rise as a direct result of the legislation" -- and that "60% of small business leaders say that as a result of the new health care law, they are more likely to consider reducing healthcare benefits to their employees."
The article also reports that "owners of small businesses are deeply unsettled about the present and concerned about the future. Fully 56% of actual small business owners (with 5 to 200 employees) are 'somewhat' or 'very uncertain' about 'making long-term business decisions and future business investments.'" and almost half "are somewhat/very uncertain that they will still exist five years from now."
http://www.finchannel.com/Main_News/Business/71441_U.S._Chamber%3A_Bipartisan_Poll_Highlighting_Small_Business_Leaders%E2%80%99_Concerns_with_Health_Care_Law/
Larry Kopsa CPA
(The FINANCIAL) -- FinChannel.com reports, "Six months after enactment of the new health reform law, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has released a national bipartisan poll of 590 small business leaders." The survey finds nearly 80% of small business leaders "expect their costs to increase as a result of the new law, and a majority say they will be less likely to hire new employees and more likely to reduce current health care benefits."
The survey also finds that "regardless of whether the business is 20 employees or 200 employees, at least 75% of small business leaders across all sizes expected their costs to rise as a direct result of the legislation" -- and that "60% of small business leaders say that as a result of the new health care law, they are more likely to consider reducing healthcare benefits to their employees."
The article also reports that "owners of small businesses are deeply unsettled about the present and concerned about the future. Fully 56% of actual small business owners (with 5 to 200 employees) are 'somewhat' or 'very uncertain' about 'making long-term business decisions and future business investments.'" and almost half "are somewhat/very uncertain that they will still exist five years from now."
Tough Questions For Obama About ObamaCare
Forbes magazine just published an interesting article about healthcare comparing what we were told it was compared to apparently what it is. Remember "you don't need to read the bill, just pass it and then you can read it."
If you are interested in health reform I thought you would be interested in this. I thought that the section on "Is it a tax or is it not a tax" was especially interesting.
Click the link below to read the full story:
http://blogs.forbes.com/merrillmatthews/2010/09/22/tough-questions-for-obama-about-obamacare/?partner=alerts
Larry Kopsa CPA
If you are interested in health reform I thought you would be interested in this. I thought that the section on "Is it a tax or is it not a tax" was especially interesting.
Click the link below to read the full story:
http://blogs.forbes.com/merrillmatthews/2010/09/22/tough-questions-for-obama-about-obamacare/?partner=alerts
Larry Kopsa CPA
Thursday, September 23, 2010
CAN I STILL TRANSFER MONEY TO MY CHURCH FROM MY IRA WITHOUT TAX?
In the past I have been able to transfer money directly from my IRA to my church. This was a good deal because I did not have enough itemized deductions. Can I do that again this year?
Howard
Howard this was a good idea for the last couple of years but you will have to wait if you want to be sure that the donation will be tax free.
First a little background. This provision allowed taxpayers that were over 70½ up to $100,000 a year tax free from regular IRAs or Roths. Although this had been a popular tax break, lawmakers allowed it to lapse at the end of 2009 along with other popular easings, such as the sales tax deduction.
We anticipate that the President and Congress will deal with renewing the expiring provisions in the lame-duck session. You will have to wait and see.
Howard
Howard this was a good idea for the last couple of years but you will have to wait if you want to be sure that the donation will be tax free.
First a little background. This provision allowed taxpayers that were over 70½ up to $100,000 a year tax free from regular IRAs or Roths. Although this had been a popular tax break, lawmakers allowed it to lapse at the end of 2009 along with other popular easings, such as the sales tax deduction.
We anticipate that the President and Congress will deal with renewing the expiring provisions in the lame-duck session. You will have to wait and see.
INFORMATION IF YOU HAVE A FLEX PLAN OR A HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
Here is a change that is coming up that you need to be aware of.
If you have cash left in your flex plan or health reimbursement account consider buying over-the-counter drugs this year. The new health care law provides that for purchases after 2010, flex plans and HRAs can’t reimburse the cost of such medications. Payments are allowed only for prescriptions and insulin.
The same is true for for payouts from health savings accounts and Archer MSAs. There is a limited exception for plans using debit cards. The Internal Revenue will okay over-the-counter drug purchases made with the cards through January 15, 2011
to give debit card issuers a little extra time to reprogram their computer systems.
Don't forget that plans will have to be amended by June 30, 2011 to comply with the rules. The revision must be retroactive to Jan. 1 (or Jan. 15 for plans using debit cards).
If you have cash left in your flex plan or health reimbursement account consider buying over-the-counter drugs this year. The new health care law provides that for purchases after 2010, flex plans and HRAs can’t reimburse the cost of such medications. Payments are allowed only for prescriptions and insulin.
The same is true for for payouts from health savings accounts and Archer MSAs. There is a limited exception for plans using debit cards. The Internal Revenue will okay over-the-counter drug purchases made with the cards through January 15, 2011
to give debit card issuers a little extra time to reprogram their computer systems.
Don't forget that plans will have to be amended by June 30, 2011 to comply with the rules. The revision must be retroactive to Jan. 1 (or Jan. 15 for plans using debit cards).
HOW THE GOVERNMENT IS IMPACTING SMALL BUSINESS
Every time you turn around it seems that government is slapping regulation and requirements on small business.
Here are some facts from the Small Business Administration (SBA). Small businesses:
•Represent 99.7% of all employer[s]
•Employ just over half of all private-sector employees
•Pay 44% of total U.S. private payroll
•Have generated 64% of net new jobs over the past 15 years
•Create more than half of the nonfarm private gross domestic product (GDP)
•Hire 40% of high-tech workers (such as scientists, engineers and computer programmers)
•Are 52% home-based and 2% franchises
•Made up 97.3% of all identified exporters and produced 30.2% of the known export value in FY 2007.
•Small firms produce 13 times more patents per employee than large patenting firms; these patents are twice as likely as large-firm patents to be among the 1% most cited.
Further, if you look to the Kauffman Foundation, startup firms are the “sole engine” of job creation in the U.S. economy. Kauffman crunched a data set from the Census Bureau covering the years 1977-2005. In all but seven years during that period, existing businesses cut an average 1 million jobs, while firms in existence for a year or less created 3 million
Here is an article from Forbes magazine that summarized the problem.
http://blogs.forbes.com/greatspeculations/2010/09/03/government-declares-war-on-small-business/?partner=alerts
Here are some facts from the Small Business Administration (SBA). Small businesses:
•Represent 99.7% of all employer[s]
•Employ just over half of all private-sector employees
•Pay 44% of total U.S. private payroll
•Have generated 64% of net new jobs over the past 15 years
•Create more than half of the nonfarm private gross domestic product (GDP)
•Hire 40% of high-tech workers (such as scientists, engineers and computer programmers)
•Are 52% home-based and 2% franchises
•Made up 97.3% of all identified exporters and produced 30.2% of the known export value in FY 2007.
•Small firms produce 13 times more patents per employee than large patenting firms; these patents are twice as likely as large-firm patents to be among the 1% most cited.
Further, if you look to the Kauffman Foundation, startup firms are the “sole engine” of job creation in the U.S. economy. Kauffman crunched a data set from the Census Bureau covering the years 1977-2005. In all but seven years during that period, existing businesses cut an average 1 million jobs, while firms in existence for a year or less created 3 million
Here is an article from Forbes magazine that summarized the problem.
http://blogs.forbes.com/greatspeculations/2010/09/03/government-declares-war-on-small-business/?partner=alerts
Friday, August 27, 2010
RONI DEUTCH SUED BY CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
I presume that you have seen the Roni Deutch commercial on TV claiming that she can negotiate with the IRS and you will only have to pay pennies on the dollar. These ads always infuriate me because, as a tax professional, I know that she cannot do what she claims and her claims confuse the public. According to the lawsuit, the claims made in the ads are false and the people actually still owe the money. She spends over $3,000,000 per year on advertising.
The thing that upsets me the most is that the people that she is preying on are having financial problems in the first place and working with her just makes their problems worse. Look at the lawsuits. The 45 people working for her are not tax experts, but actually salespeople.
Now she gets what is coming to her. Roni Deutch, the so-called “Tax Lady” has been slapped with a $34 million law suit by California Attorney General, Jerry Brown.
According to the Attorney General’s web site, “Tax Lady Roni Deutch is engaged in a heartless scheme that swindled people with tax problems. She promises to significantly reduce their IRS tax debts, but instead preys on their vulnerability, taking large up-front payments but providing little or no help in lowering their tax bills.”
Brown’s office says that rather than reducing tax bills, Deutch actually increases taxpayer’s debt by putting them “in an endless loop of requests.” Brown claims the reason for the requests are to boost her bottom line at the expense of the taxpayer.
Further, Brown says that Deutch’s TV ads are “misleading” and feature fictional testimonials promising impressive results, despite the fact that Deutch’s success rate is said to be about 10% in tax cases. The claim states that “most clients never obtain a tax debt resolution” from Deutch.
In the complaint, Brown specifically cites an ad called, “It’s Your Turn” which features three clients whom Deutch claims to have “saved” from having to pay thousands of dollars to the IRS. According to Brown, those clients still owe the IRS the full amount of their taxes, plus interest and penalties.
Deutch’s practices inside her firm are called to the carpet in the complaint, as well. Brown’s office claims that Deutch’s law firm is actually a high pressure “boiler room” where she belittles her employees. “She screams at and berates sales agents who are not performing adequately,” according to the complaint. The complaint alleges that Deutch requires her employees to promise callers results that the potential clients are likely to never see.
Brown’s complaint seeks nearly $34 million in restitution for clients, including funds to refund taxpayer retainers which Brown’s office alleges were improperly retained. The complaint also seeks to prevent Deutch from engaging in unfair business practices and false advertising. The State has also asked for a preliminary injunction to force Deutch to cease her “illegal practices” prior to the resolution of the complaint.
Deutch and her office had to see this coming. In March, Brown posted an alert for California taxpayers warning them to avoid “phony tax-relief companies” that charge exorbitant fees, but provide no actual relief. At the time, Brown advised taxpayers, “Every tax season, phony tax-relief companies emerge to exploit cash-strapped Californians who owe back taxes to the IRS. Taxpayers should be on high alert, avoid paying up-front fees to these companies and never ignore notices from the IRS.”
This isn’t Deutch’s first public complaint. In 2006, she agreed to pay $300,000 to settle a lawsuit filed by New York City’s Department of Consumer Affairs for similar complaints about her misleading commercials.
I’ve heard a number of complaints from taxpayers who have worked with so-called tax debt relief companies who promise big results. I’ll just say this… If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. There’s a reason that you don’t see most tax attorneys on TV promising you “pennies on the dollar.” I can’t stress enough how important it is to work with a trustworthy tax professional – one that returns phone calls and letters, one that keeps you posted about the status of your matter – to resolve your tax obligations.
Take a look at Deutch's website at: www.ronideutch.com. Listen to the testimonials, and then listen to what the California attorney general is saying about her:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/breaking/california-ag-sues-tax-lady-roni-deutch-for-34-million-accuses-her-of-defrauding-customers-101323199.html.
p.s. She doesn't really look like the picture on her website.
Larry Kopsa CPA
The thing that upsets me the most is that the people that she is preying on are having financial problems in the first place and working with her just makes their problems worse. Look at the lawsuits. The 45 people working for her are not tax experts, but actually salespeople.
Now she gets what is coming to her. Roni Deutch, the so-called “Tax Lady” has been slapped with a $34 million law suit by California Attorney General, Jerry Brown.
According to the Attorney General’s web site, “Tax Lady Roni Deutch is engaged in a heartless scheme that swindled people with tax problems. She promises to significantly reduce their IRS tax debts, but instead preys on their vulnerability, taking large up-front payments but providing little or no help in lowering their tax bills.”
Brown’s office says that rather than reducing tax bills, Deutch actually increases taxpayer’s debt by putting them “in an endless loop of requests.” Brown claims the reason for the requests are to boost her bottom line at the expense of the taxpayer.
Further, Brown says that Deutch’s TV ads are “misleading” and feature fictional testimonials promising impressive results, despite the fact that Deutch’s success rate is said to be about 10% in tax cases. The claim states that “most clients never obtain a tax debt resolution” from Deutch.
In the complaint, Brown specifically cites an ad called, “It’s Your Turn” which features three clients whom Deutch claims to have “saved” from having to pay thousands of dollars to the IRS. According to Brown, those clients still owe the IRS the full amount of their taxes, plus interest and penalties.
Deutch’s practices inside her firm are called to the carpet in the complaint, as well. Brown’s office claims that Deutch’s law firm is actually a high pressure “boiler room” where she belittles her employees. “She screams at and berates sales agents who are not performing adequately,” according to the complaint. The complaint alleges that Deutch requires her employees to promise callers results that the potential clients are likely to never see.
Brown’s complaint seeks nearly $34 million in restitution for clients, including funds to refund taxpayer retainers which Brown’s office alleges were improperly retained. The complaint also seeks to prevent Deutch from engaging in unfair business practices and false advertising. The State has also asked for a preliminary injunction to force Deutch to cease her “illegal practices” prior to the resolution of the complaint.
Deutch and her office had to see this coming. In March, Brown posted an alert for California taxpayers warning them to avoid “phony tax-relief companies” that charge exorbitant fees, but provide no actual relief. At the time, Brown advised taxpayers, “Every tax season, phony tax-relief companies emerge to exploit cash-strapped Californians who owe back taxes to the IRS. Taxpayers should be on high alert, avoid paying up-front fees to these companies and never ignore notices from the IRS.”
This isn’t Deutch’s first public complaint. In 2006, she agreed to pay $300,000 to settle a lawsuit filed by New York City’s Department of Consumer Affairs for similar complaints about her misleading commercials.
I’ve heard a number of complaints from taxpayers who have worked with so-called tax debt relief companies who promise big results. I’ll just say this… If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. There’s a reason that you don’t see most tax attorneys on TV promising you “pennies on the dollar.” I can’t stress enough how important it is to work with a trustworthy tax professional – one that returns phone calls and letters, one that keeps you posted about the status of your matter – to resolve your tax obligations.
Take a look at Deutch's website at: www.ronideutch.com. Listen to the testimonials, and then listen to what the California attorney general is saying about her:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/breaking/california-ag-sues-tax-lady-roni-deutch-for-34-million-accuses-her-of-defrauding-customers-101323199.html.
p.s. She doesn't really look like the picture on her website.
Larry Kopsa CPA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)