It's official. After
eight years of having the second-highest corporate tax rate among
industrialized countries, the United States has now assumed the top spot
following Japan's scheduled corporate rate cut on April 1, 2012. Since 2001,
Japan had levied the highest combined corporate tax rate among OECD nations at
39.5 percent, slightly higher than the 39.2 percent combined federal-state rate
in the U.S. This does not include state taxes.
Friday, April 20, 2012
Thursday, April 19, 2012
THE TAX SYSTEM EXPLAINED IN BEER
Suppose that every
day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they
paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this...
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20." Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men? The paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from every body's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.
And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.
"I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, "but he got $10!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar too. It's unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!"
"That's true!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison, "we didn't get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!" The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20." Drinks for the ten men would now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men? The paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from every body's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.
And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.
"I only got a dollar out of the $20 saving," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, "but he got $10!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar too. It's unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!"
"That's true!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back, when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison, "we didn't get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!" The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
TAX FACTS
Here are some statistics to put the nation’s income tax system in perspective:
► 143 million tax returns were filed with the IRS in 2010, some of which represent households and married couples.
► Only 85 million actually paid taxes out of the 143 million filers. In other words, 58 million, or 41%, were non-payers. 96% of these non-payers made less than $50,000.
► The IRS paid out $105 billion in refundable credits to filers who paid no income tax.
► The effective tax rate for those making less than $50,000 was 3.5%, and their share of taxes paid was 6.7%.
► The effective tax rate for those making more than $50,000 was 14.1%, and their share of taxes paid was 93.3%.
► The effective tax rate for those making more than $250,000 was 23.4%, and their share of taxes paid was 45.7%.
► The IRS estimates that it takes more than 7 billion hours to comply with the tax code each year.
► The tax code is now 3.8 million words long.
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
DEATH AND TAXES
Death and taxes aren’t only certain; they also seem to share a same
deadline in the U.S., according to a study that points to the role of stress in
fatal accidents.
According to Bloomberg.com: Deaths from traffic accidents around April 15,
traditionally the last day to file individual income taxes in the U.S., rose 6
percent on average on each of the last 30 years of tax filing days compared
with a day during the week prior and a week later, according to research
published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Even allowing Americans to file their taxes
electronically hasn’t negated the crash trend, lead researcher Donald
Redelmeier said. The findings suggest stress, lack of sleep, alcohol use and
less tolerance to other drivers on tax deadline day may contribute to an
increase in deaths on the road, Redelmeier said.
“An increase of risk in this magnitude is
about the same as what we observe on Super Bowl Sunday, a time notorious in the
U.S. for drinking and driving,” said Redelmeier, a professor of medicine at the
University of Toronto in Canada, in an April 6 telephone interview.
The research showed that there were 226 fatal
crashes for each of the 30 tax days and 213 fatal accidents for each of the 60
control days.
Stressful
Deadlines
“Our research suggests that stressful
deadlines can contribute to driver error that can contribute to fatal crashes,”
Redelmeier said. “People have, for a long time, speculated that psychological
stress may contribute to real world crashes, but this is the first study to pin
that down.”
The study, which appears as a research letter
in the medical journal, looked at tax deadline data from the Internal Revenue
Service and fatal traffic accident data from the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration from 1980 to 2009. The researchers then used a database
to identify crashes that led to deaths. For every tax day, they also identified
a day one week before and one week after as a comparison.
Redelmeier said drivers who are stressed
should remember to buckle their seat belts, obey the speed limit, avoid
alcohol, minimize distractions and refrain from driving recklessly.
“Under normal circumstances, everyone nods
their heads agreeable,” he said. “Under stressful circumstances, it’s when you
tend to forget these pieces of advice.”
To read the article:
CLICK HERE
WE MADE IT
We finally made it to the end of the 2012 tax season and due to our office changing software, I must say it has been a little more difficult than normal and all of the returns took a little longer than usual, but our team did a great job and our clients, as usual, gave us some grace.
I just want to take this time to say thanks to all of our readers for their questions during the season and our readership continues to grow each month and I look forward to my 41st tax season next year.
I will be traveling to New York City this weekend, speaking at the IBS show at the Jacob Jarvis Center and then meeting with some of our New York clients and some of our other distance clients that are in attendance. My wife Maggie is going with me so there will be a little R&R between meetings.
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Friday, April 13, 2012
OBAMA'S REVENUE SOUP
Wall Street Journal
editorial, Obama's Revenue Soup: A History Lesson on Capital Gains Taxes:
In
"Annie Hall," Woody Allen tells the joke of two women complaining
about a restaurant. The first says the food here is awful and the second
replies, yes, and they serve such small portions. Sounds like President Obama's
proposal to raise the capital-gains tax: It will hurt the economy and it won't
raise much new revenue.
Mr.
Obama's plan would raise the capital-gains rate on January 1 to 20% on those
who earn more than $200,000 ($250,000 for couples), plus a 3.8% investment
surtax to finance ObamaCare. That 23.8% rate amounts to a nearly 60% increase
from the 15% rate in effect since 2003. And that's without his new
"Buffett rule," which would take the rate to 30% for many taxpayers.
This
and other rate hikes aimed at higher-income earners are supposed to raise about
$700 billion in tax revenues over the next decade. Fat chance. Ever since the
famous 1978 bipartisan capital-gains tax cut sponsored by the late William
Steiger of Wisconsin, the same pattern has repeated itself: raising the
capital-gains rate reduces revenues, and lowering it leads to revenue
increases.
The
nearby chart shows the 35-year trend in capital-gains revenue and tax
rates—through 2008, the last year data are available.
The
data clearly show that the overall economy is the single biggest factor in
capital-gains realizations and revenue. But the data also show that time and
again revenue has multiplied despite a lower rate, and arguably because of it.
... Congress shouldn't be fooled by government forecasters who predict a
revenue boom from a higher capital-gains rate. They have blown this call every
time. ...
In
our view the optimal capital-gains tax rate is one that leads to the most
capital investment, jobs and wealth gains for American workers. That
economically optimal rate is somewhere close to zero and would lead to more
overall tax revenue as the economy grew faster. But if Congress wants a capital-gains
tax, history suggests the revenue maximizing rate is closer to 15% than to
23.8%.
As
John F. Kennedy put it in 1963 when he endorsed a cut in this tax: "The
tax on capital gains directly affects investment decisions, the mobility and
flow of risk capital" as well as "the ease or difficulty experienced
by new ventures in obtaining capital, and thereby the strength and potential
for growth in the economy."
Today's
Democrats in Washington are no Jack Kennedys. As President Obama told Charlie
Gibson of ABC News in 2008, whether or not a higher capital-gains tax raises
more revenue is irrelevant to him. He wants a higher rate as a matter of
"fairness." The soup may be lousy but he wants more of it.
IRS GETS HALF A BILLION TO IMPLEMENT OBAMA HEALTH LAW
Did you ever wonder why the IRS is getting involved in our health care? It has to do with them monitoring all the businesses to determine that they are providing the required coverage. If you have ever tried to call the IRS you should be afraid. It is not unusual to be on hold for 30 minutes. I have even been on hold and then the music goes away and a busy signal comes over the phone. I call back only to find that they are now closed for the day.
Even though the Supreme Court is looking at Obamacare they still are going forward funding the IRS. See the article that was in Market Watch: CLICK HERE
Thursday, April 12, 2012
2012 PRESIDENTIAL RACE
As you most likely know, on April 9, former
Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum suspended his campaign for the 2012
presidential race. This move effectively clears the way for former
Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney to assume the Republican nomination. This
helps clear the way in determining your future tax situation Romney has made taxes a
centerpiece of his campaign, and we expect to see even more attention focused
on the issue as November draws near:
- Romney would make the Bush tax cuts permanent.
- He would cut top rates to 25% for both individuals and corporations.
- He would eliminate tax on interest, dividends, and capital gains for taxpayers making under $200,000.
- He would eliminate the estate tax entirely.
- He would eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) as well as new taxes imposed by the 2010 health care reform legislation.
We realize that this year's Presidential
race will have a major effect on your taxes. So we're committed to tracking
both candidates' tax proposals, letting you know how they affect your wallet,
and offering proactive suggestions to plan for tax law changes. We're not here
to take sides. We just want you to know we've got your back.
We'll be following the race
carefully through November and beyond. So, if you have questions, don't
hesitate to contact us.
Saturday, April 7, 2012
I CAN'T PAY MY TAXES - WHAT DO I DO?
Q. I blew it. I owe tax and don’t have any money. What do I do? Am I going to jail? Should I hide?
A . The worst thing you can do is ignore the problem. If you owe tax with your federal tax return, but can't afford to pay it all when you file, there are some things you can do to keep interest and penalties to a minimum.
- File your return on time and pay as much as you can with the return. By doing this it will eliminate the late filing penalty, reduce the late payment penalty and cut down on interest charges
- Consider obtaining a loan or paying by credit card. The interest rate and fees charged by a bank or credit card company may be lower than interest and penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Code
- Request an installment payment agreement. You do not need to wait for IRS to send you a bill before requesting a payment agreement. Options for requesting an agreement include:
- Using the Online Payment Agreement application and
IRS charges a user fee to set up your payment agreement. See
·
- Request an extension of time to pay. For tax year 2011, if you qualify you may request an extension of time to pay and have the late payment penalty waived as part of the IRS Fresh Start Initiative. To see if you qualify visit www.irs.gov and get form 1127-A, Application for Extension of Time for Payment. But hurry, your application must be filed by April 17, 2012.
Good luck, and start saving for 2012. Estimated payments are due 4/15/12, 6/15/12, 9/15/12 and 1/15/13. I would work on the 2011 first.
www.irs.gov or the installment agreement request form for fee amounts.
WHERE THE HECK IS MY REFUND?
Here’s your obvious statistic
of the tax season: most early filers do so because they are expecting a refund.
And by now, many of those taxpayers want to know, “Where the heck is my
refund?”
According to the IRS, 90% of
taxpayers will receive a refund in 21 days or less. That’s the average taking
into account all returns filed, whether e-filed or filed with traditional paper
returns.
How can you speed that process
up? The IRS says that if you e-file and use direct deposit, you can receive
your refund in as few as ten days. I’ve heard of folks getting them as quickly
as three.
Who might have to wait? The
usual suspects: taxpayers who make mistakes. Submitting an error free return
increases the likelihood that your refund will be processed quickly. Mistakes –
sloppy returns, transposed numbers or bad math – can slow down processing and
result in delays.
The IRS warns that ramped up
scrutiny for fraud may slow down some refunds. If your refund is sizable or if
it’s based on a credit that the IRS has identified as ripe for abuse (EITC and
fuel tax credits, for example), your return might get a second look.
Other issues that can affect
the timing of your refund include bankruptcy, an open audit or a balance due on
a related account such as a different tax year. Your refund may also be slowed
if you are subject to an offset for outstanding liabilities such as delinquent
child support or unpaid student loans.
If you’ve done everything right
and your refund feels slow, you can check on the status with the IRS. You’ll
need to wait at least 72 hours after you e-file or three weeks after you mail
your paper return before you can make an inquiry.
To check on your refund, you’ll
need to have your tax return handy. You’ll need to enter:
- Your Social Security Number
- Your filing status
- The amount of your refund as shown on your tax return
Here’s a quick caveat about
dates: if you’ve amended your return using a form 1040X, all bets are off. It
may take 8 to 12 weeks or longer to process the return. If 8 weeks have passed
after you’ve filed a form 1040X and you have not received your refund, call the
IRS at (800) 829-1040. Be prepared to wait (and wait).
Finally, if your check is supposed
to be in your mailbox and it’s not because it was lost, stolen, or destroyed,
you can file an online claim for a replacement check. You can make the claim if
it’s been more than 28 days from the date that the IRS says it mailed your
refund. Head over to the “Where’s My Refund?” tool on IRS.gov for details.
Friday, April 6, 2012
DON'T HAVE YOUR ROTH IRA OWN S CORPORATION STOCK
The Appeals Court has ruled that a taxpayer that put his S corporation stock in a Roth IRA tainted the S election so therefore the corporation was a C corporation. Because a Roth IRA is an ineligible S shareholder, the company is taxed as a regular corporation (Taproot Admin. Services, 9th Cir.).
The rational is that the Roth doesn’t owe tax on its share of the firm’s earnings and the Roth owner wouldn’t be taxed on payouts from the account once it had been in existence for five years and the owner was 59½.
The rational is that the Roth doesn’t owe tax on its share of the firm’s earnings and the Roth owner wouldn’t be taxed on payouts from the account once it had been in existence for five years and the owner was 59½.
Thursday, April 5, 2012
MORE TIME TO FILE FOR SOME
Most people must file their tax return on April 17th this year but some taxpayers get more time to file without having to ask for it.
These include:
• Taxpayers abroad. U.S. citizens and resident aliens who live and work abroad, as well as members of the military on duty outside the U.S., have until June 15 to file. Tax payments are still due April 17.
• Members of the military and others serving in Iraq, Afghanistan or other combat zone localities. Typically, taxpayers can wait until at least 180 days after they leave the combat zone to file returns and pay any taxes due. For details, see Extensions of Deadlines in Publication 3 , Armed Forces Tax Guide.
• People affected by certain tornadoes, severe storms, floods and other recent natural disasters. Currently, parts of Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia are covered by federal disaster declarations, and affected individuals and businesses in these areas have until May 31 to file and pay.
These include:
• Taxpayers abroad. U.S. citizens and resident aliens who live and work abroad, as well as members of the military on duty outside the U.S., have until June 15 to file. Tax payments are still due April 17.
• Members of the military and others serving in Iraq, Afghanistan or other combat zone localities. Typically, taxpayers can wait until at least 180 days after they leave the combat zone to file returns and pay any taxes due. For details, see Extensions of Deadlines in Publication 3 , Armed Forces Tax Guide.
• People affected by certain tornadoes, severe storms, floods and other recent natural disasters. Currently, parts of Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia are covered by federal disaster declarations, and affected individuals and businesses in these areas have until May 31 to file and pay.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)